PickensPlan

More Power, More Mileage, More Style - Mercedes Mods 80’s 190D

Jo Borras, September 4, 2009, Car hacks

What you see above (center) is one of the most well-engineered “Franken-cars” of all time: a factory-modified 1980’s era Mercedes-Benz 190 diesel, stuffed with the company’s latest BlueEFFICIENCY CDI engine, which makes more than double the horsepower and nearly three times the torque of the original 1988 D.

How far we’ve come in 20 years!

More photos, and MBUSA’s own comprehensive press release, after the jump.

I’ve always been partial to the 70’s and 80’s era Benzes. Designed by legendary stylist and engineer Bruno Sacco, the clean lines of the cars became synonymous with luxury and power. The 190 “baby Benz” was no exception, and the 190 E 2.6 Sportline (shown, above) was chosen by Mercedes’ engineers as the sleekest example of the breed - and, therefore, the type most “deserving” of a thoroughbred heart transplant …

Make no mistake: Mercedes’ new BlueEFFICIENCY engines are thoroughbreds, tasked with nothing less than making the word “diesel” as synonymous with luxury and power as the lines of the old classics. These engines have appeared on these pages before, but all the important bits were glossed over.

Consider these facts:

* It’s a small 4-cylinder engine that produces 204 hp - 1 pony shy of Ford’s iconic 5.0 Mustang
* It delivers 368 lb-ft of torque - 25 more than Ferrari’s F430 supercar
* It rockets the 190 from 0-60 in 6.2 seconds - about the same as Nissan’s 350Z sportscar (which has 2 fewer doors and 3 fewer seats)
* Given all that, the engine still returns 48 mpg - 5 mpg more than Honda’s latest Insight Hybrid

Oh, yes!

This car is no shade-tree hack, either - it was engineered and developed by factory Mercedes engineers at Stuttgart, Germany, to drive the point home: this is not the diesel engine of 20 years ago. This is a new diesel. A flagship, announcing that diesels have finally arrived.

Official Press Release, below

Stuttgart - September 3, 2009

From the outside it looks just like a more than 20 year-old Mercedes 190, tens of thousands of well-preserved examples of which can still be seen on Germany’s roads. Pressing the accelerator tells a different story: equipped with the ultra-modern OM651 common-rail engine developing 150 kW / 204 hp, the Mercedes 190 D BlueEFFICIENCY shows the full potential of this new four-cylinder diesel engine. With a maximum torque of 500 Nm between 1600 and 1800 rpm, this experimental car has more than twice the torque of the most powerful model in the old W 201-series. The 190 E 2.5-16 Evolution II, which was presented in 1990 and produced 502 times as a homologation model for the Group A DTM touring cars, “only” manages 245 Nm.

The idea for this unusual experimental vehicle came about during an evening discussion about the enormous developments in diesel technology over the last 20 years. The question was: “How might one make this progress directly tangible, in isolation from the equally profound changes in the safety and comfort of the car as a whole?” The result was a factory-tuned car of a different kind: the 190 D BlueEFFICIENCY. It accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in 6.2 seconds. It therefore manages this standard sprint 11.9 seconds faster than a 190 D of the time, which caused a sensation on its 1983 introduction with its newly developed, fully encapsulated “whisper-diesel”.

The differences between the two diesel generations are even more impressive when it comes to fuel consumption: despite the significant increase in output by 72 hp (OM 601, 1988) to 204 hp (OM651, 2009), the new engine in the old body consumes 4.9 litres per 100 kilometres (NEDC) instead of the 7.3 litre figure for 1988.

But what is really astonishing is that measured according to the DINstandard used during the time of the 190 D, the Euro-Mix consumption of the current C 250 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY is a mere 4.6 litres per 100 kilometres, and 5.1 litres per 100 kilometres according to the present NEDC method. This represents an improvement of around 30 percent - not to mention the exhaust emission levels.

The playing field is by no means level: a Mercedes 190 D is 385 kilograms lighter than a current C 250 CDIBlueEFFICIENCY, for example. In addition to more interior space - the current C-Class model is 16 centimetres longer, and around nine centimetres wider and higher than a 190 - this is due to the high standard of comfort and safety features.

As a genuine Mercedes, the model 190 was ahead of its time in terms of safety technology. Nonetheless, customers at the time enjoyed nothing like the extensive array of passive and active safety systems to be found as standard in the current C 250 CDIBlueEFFICIENCY. These include seven airbags, the adaptive AGILITY CONTROL suspension and numerous assistance systems such as ESP® and ADAPTIVE BRAKE. Comfort-enhancing features like the ergonomically exemplary, multi-adjustable seats or electrically adjustable and heated exterior mirrors also contribute to the higher weight.

A number of factors are responsible for the outstanding efficiency of the current C-Class. Aerodynamics is one of them: with a Cd figure of 0.34 the 190 set an example for its time. The new C-Class betters this figure by far, however, and is once again the trendsetter in this segment with a Cd figure of 0.27. The progress is equally impressive where the powertrain is concerned: while the 190 D was equipped with a four- or optionally five speed manual transmission, the C 250 CDIhas six gears available. Plus a large number of friction-reducing measures. The radiator fan, power steering and generator also operate much more efficiently than 20 years ago.

Tags: Mercedes, diesel

Views: 2

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

New Benz BlueTec Diesels Won't Run Without Urea

Clean Diesel sounds good, (Remember the Diesel VW Rabbit?) but, a few require a Urea Additive to pass emissions inspections. (Now that might sound dandy to some beer drinkers...) Wonder if this is 1? (Can you ferment your own Urea? Sure!) What happens if the Vehicle runs out of Urea? Won't run! It's injected, post combustion, behind the exhust manifold. (Maybe you can refill it using a funnel + hose conviently tucked under the drivers seat? Great on those excessivelly long road trips! Remember the boozin' & cruzin' Days... BEFORE DWI's? A rig just like that...)

Here they don't mention Urea? Or how much you have to add per tank of diesel?
I would look into the long term, vibration side effects on these low volume / 4 cyl diesels..May require special materials to keep all the seals intact. Good idea though.
The older diesels did have less power than competing gasoline engines. I suspect most people could be happy with less power than this, however. The mpg would go up with a smaller, lighter engine. A plug-in hybrid diesel may be a good way to get better power from a smaller diesel.
A newer C230K has 1.8 liter with a supercharger. It has 189 hp and gets 30 mpg on the highway at 70 mph with the AC. Put an additional motor on the belt or after the trans and it could get 30 mpg in the city instead of 20 mpg. There are lots of configurations that can save fuel, it is getting enough of them out there in the near term that is the challenge. Why we are at it, change a few components and make it FFV E85 capable to use cellulose ethanol and make it a plug hybrid. Of course, we would have to get many more E85 pumps across the country to reduce oil imports, but that is not that difficult either.

RSS

© 2013   Created by PickensPlan.   Powered by

Badges  |  Community Guidelines  | Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service