It seems overly complicated. Why use electricity to free up natural gas to then use in cars, when you can just use the electricity in electric cars? There are already many more electric cars in circulation and production than natural gas cars. And pretty much every household is already on the electrical grid, and there are very few natural gas stations around the country, some in California, but I'm not sure there's a single natural gas station for cars in the entire state of Georgia. So I do support the idea of building wind farms across the midwest, and I do support the idea of building copper connections to distribute the electricity. I'm not sure I follow the natural gas crossover to cars, nor sure that I support a trillion dollar handout to do it, when the energy companies that build these windfarms (Pickens is already building the largest in the country in North Texas without any government hand-outs) are going to be collecting revenue for the electricity indefinately. Sure, it would be a big investment to do it, and I'd buy as much stock in such a venture as I could afford, as a long term investment. Surely this whole thing could be done without a trillion dollar handout, through free market investment, perhaps eliminate taxes or some other method to expedite and encourage the project, but I don't think our economy can take another trillion dollar hit and continue financing wars and everything else the government does, in a record deficit, in major debt to China. I'm still open to ideas though, if there's something I'm missing, please fill me in! And overall, I just want to reiterate that I'm am on board with building wind farms like gang busters so I do support that part of the plan, just not the trillion dollar handout.
Tags:
Share
-
▶ Reply to This