We want to Invest in the Pickens Plan

Comment

Comment by Paul on February 19, 2009 at 11:47am

Just my $0.02...

TEINF, the posts are cute, the theme is patriotic, but the content is OT for this group Solar Power" and "We want to Invest..." too.

Support the FairTax!

Comment by Jack carey on February 19, 2009 at 10:38am

Comment by Bonnie S 12 hours ago
Jack: Sorry, didn't know you we're posting someone else's stuff. And if its not inaccurate, I'd sure like to know more. Never know what nuggets will turn up. Here's a few requests:

1. You mention patents. Please provide the numbers. I certainly would not expect info on the proprietary stuff without a confidentiality agreement. No NDA's are necessary to see and evaluate various operational demo's in Mo.
A) Thanks for inquiring in an orderly investigative manner. If you wish Please Consider Calling for more in depth concept clarifications 810 820 4572 The Inventor in Mo. doesn't have a phone or e mail. Because His home then his cell were being monitored But He has the mentioned patent info. He's not concerned that anyone would be able to duplicate.

2. Explain Dr Jan R's credentials a little more. 45 years and a PE associate. You're either a PE or you're an EIT or you're neither, and thats pretty much country wide. Chief Eng at 20 companies? That's way tough to do, even in 45 years. What are some of the companies?
B) He's a ME/PE and associated with me and the inventor If you wish I'll provide his Contact info via mail after a conversation. He's 75 and was born in Europe. Background---When he was a child he lived in the far east and was in a Japanese prison camp. He first attended ME school in Europe, Then MIT. He's been here twice He provided additional and revised Cad Cam per the inventor's instructions that was needed for his indicated below Magnetic Motor Prototype Tech. Now lack of Money is the problem.

3. If you've figured how to get a carburetor to perform as well as fuel injection, that is way cool. But why do you need it at all if you're vaporizing the fuel before feeding into cylinders? Besides, I don't think carbs handle gas (vapors).

C) Engines are capable of operating with NG vapors in a far more efficient manner than with liquid. But basically No fuel distribution infrastructure exists. Carb or T body Gas engines feed a tube and tube. The Carb/Tbody has been repositioned to one end and the other end is mounted on the intake. Fuel is fed through and separated into small droplets in the inter tube.

Process wise Exhaust heat from a turned upside down exhaust manifold is fed into the chambered area formed by the outer tube.The vehicles computer determines flow that's reduced at least 50%. No computer, a Carb would still feed what it normally would which is far more than necessary.

D) To solve that problem for say 50's through say late 80's vehicles. I have one of those ultra efficient 1950's Carb's, Two versions existed I have the large one for V 8's that could be reproduced. It's the size of a normal small 2 Barrel Carb. The inventor knows of a small version somewhere in NY.

I understand but have no direct knowledge it was bought off the market in the early 60's by the oil Co's. There's tens of millions of vehicles on the planet with carb's or T body's My son's 2002 full size Chevy truck had a T body. Consider owners of classic Cars would at least purchase an ultra efficient Carb, in order to reduce gas cost's

E) FI, OEM and aftermarket engines would require up stream of the injectors. the small in line (NO PATENT Necessary I can explain further if I'm contacted) unit with a wire attached to the engine (Negative Electrons via the wire reverse the polarity of liquid fuel ) The model can also be used up stream of a Carb or T body and is applicable for Diesel's. 50% increases in economy are claimed whereas with the specific aftermarket T Body model 100% increases are claimed.

Claimed Reversing polarity is also being accomplished when heat is the activator. The same action is involved with the specific design for Diesel's The various design and function inventions apply across a broad spectrum from say a lawn mower to an ocean going vessel.

Comment by TheEarthisNotFlat on February 19, 2009 at 10:05am

The Constitution, DC's New Toilet Paper

Comment by Richard G (DICK) Bowman PhD on February 19, 2009 at 12:58am

What did JACK Carey (Feb 16) mean by the lasr sentence inhid long commwnr..????
Qucte:" Naturally I don't expect anyone to believe anything stated in this mail."

APRIL FOOL'a DAY is 41 days away !!! Let's stay POSITIVE !!!

Comment by Nick Nelson on February 18, 2009 at 10:23pm

If any of you are interested in investing in anaerobic digestion complexes to transform manures, food processing waste and crop residues into biomethane and renewable based electricity I would be thrilled to have the opportunity to tell you about Midwest Biogas. We are looking to raise $2 million in capital in the next 90 days to kick start five locations with a combined capacity in excess of 4 billion SCF of biomethane as well as 35 MWs / Hr of electricity. Total project cost will be just over $250 million. We have investors and debt financing in place for as soon as we have signed construction permits the need is to financing getting those permits.

Sincerely,

Nick Nelson
President
Midwest Biogas, LLC
558 Third Street
Gaylord, MN 55334
507-351-2714
Midwest_Biogas@Hotmail.com

Comment by Bonnie S on February 18, 2009 at 5:22pm

Jack: Sorry, didn't know you we're posting someone else's stuff. And if its not inaccurate, I'd sure like to know more. Never know what nuggets will turn up. Here's a few requests:

1. You mention patents. Please provide the numbers. I certainly would not expect info on the proprietary stuff without a confidentiality agreement.
2. Explain Dr Jan R's credentials a little more. 45 years and a PE associate. You're either a PE or you're an EIT or you're neither, and thats pretty much country wide. Chief Eng at 20 companies? That's way tough to do, even in 45 years. What are some of the companies?
3. If you've figured how to get a carburetor to perform as well as fuel injection, that is way cool. But why do you need it at all if you're vaporizing the fuel before feeding into cylinders? Besides, I don't think carbs handle gas (vapors).
4. Have you identified an independent test firm to certify your results. This would go along ways.

Comment by Joseph Chiang on February 18, 2009 at 4:29pm

Mike, What you describe has a name, socialism - borderline communism.

Richard, you are right. We need to do something. But it needs to be the right something, not just to be doing something, Obama's doing that very well for us all and accomplishing nothing positive.

I think Capital is what is needed. Too many here are hurting financially from the current economic situation. Ideas and projects need to be gathered, prioritized, funded and then implemented. The funding may be through loans, private investments or grants. There are a lot of grants out there just for the asking. Just a thought.

Comment by Richard G (DICK) Bowman PhD on February 18, 2009 at 4:14pm

There is no one SILVER BULLET. It will take the right combnation (of things & people & companies) -- with Real TEAM-WORK-- if we ever want to HELP FIX AMERICA.!!!

So far-- we-all seem to be working ALONE. They also often say; don't try -- " CAN"T FIX STUPID ! "

There hastah' be CHANGE-- the OLD WAYS are WHY --- we are now where we are .. Let's think POSITIVE.. !!!

Comment by Jack carey on February 18, 2009 at 11:09am

The inventions either function as advertised or not there are no in between's and investigation is required to arrive at a determination. I wouldn't post inaccurate info.

Comment by Bonnie S on February 18, 2009 at 5:05am

Carey's apparent pitch wasn't even fit for sci fi, yet it takes up so much space on this site. If there are people interested in this, read Fernald's prior post and ask which half of the people you are. His words ring truer than ever with the stimulus and bailout plans in progress. Lets take money from the people that produce and innovate and give it to those who don't.

Now back to the subject. Today, I would not invest in anything! However, I would collect my lists and keep an eye peeled.

FYI, Buffett is picking up NRG, Eaton and Ingersoll Rand. Without doing more than 3 minutes of research, I'd say he's interested in infrastructure, power generation and power distribution, hence my reasons for recommending ABB (however, ABB is Swiss). Keep in mind, Obama talks to Buffett.

You can go ahead and invest in startups or weird devices that change the polarity of fuel, invest in small established companies that are so far in the red it ain't funny, solar and wind companies that are in good shape, etc. Or wherever your expertise lies.

My particular favorite is energy conservation, although its not fashionable and I don't know of any incentives in the so-called "stimulus" plan that support it (tax incentives to buy higher efficiency motors, etc.), but do keep in mind the very best BTU or kwhr is the one thats never used.

• First
• Previous
• Next
• Last