PickensPlan

Christopher and Daniela Rabalais
  • 39, Male
  • Humble (Houston), Texas
  • United States
Share 

Christopher and Daniela Rabalais's Friends

 

Yes We Can Implement the Pickens Plan!

Gifts Received

Gift

Christopher and Daniela Rabalais has not received any gifts yet

Give Christopher and Daniela Rabalais a Gift

Latest Activity

is thinking.
November 20
August 15
Thank you for contacting me regarding natural gas. I welcome your thoughts and comments. Natural gas is a valuable domestic asset that is abundant and cost-effective, and the cleanest-burning fossil-fuel available. The Outer Continental Shelf (OC...
August 15
Thank you for contacting me regarding natural gas. I welcome your thoughts and comments. Natural gas is a valuable domestic asset that is abundant and cost-effective, and the cleanest-burning fossil-fuel available. The Outer Continental Shelf (OC...
August 15
Dear Mr. Rabalais: Thank you for contacting my office regarding energy issues. I appreciate your thoughts on this important matter. I am committed to reducing the United States' dependency on foreign sources of oil. We cannot rely on unstabl...
August 3
Dear Mr. Rabalais: Thank you for contacting my office regarding energy issues. I appreciate your thoughts on this important matter. I am committed to reducing the United States' dependency on foreign sources of oil. We cannot rely on unstabl...
August 3
August 3
Dear Mr. Rabalais: Thank you for contacting me about our nation’s energy policy, I appreciate having the benefit of your comments on this issue. Congress must continue to pass common sense, bipartisan legislation that increases domestic energy pr...
July 29

Profile Information

Are you interested in becoming an organizer in your area?
Yes
Tell us about your experience with alternative energy:
Not much. I know only what I've been able to read and I rented a Toyota Prius once.
What excites you about this campaign?
Change the world.
What do you want to do to help?
Whatever I can.

Please Support the Future of the American Automobile Industry

I am writing you today to respectfully request that you and your Colleagues in both the United States Senate and House of Representatives back the important legislation soon to be before you. There is far more at stake here than meets the eye.



I have personally thoroughly read the GM plan several times. I do believe (as many others do) that restoring this industry is not only possible but probable. We must look beyond the petty differences and take a broad view of what this means. This industry has made mistakes and they know it. I don't think you will see business as usual in Detroit from this point forward. The restrictions being placed on these funds and the intense public focus they will face over the coming months will ensure a very high probability on their moving quickly in the direction they should to restore this industry. The amount of money being sought is essential and truly a fraction of the damage that will result from their abrupt collapse. The catastrophic economic consequences would come at a time when we can least afford them. Make no mistake; the U.S. Automobile Industry is not just another sector. It is a pillar and a flagship for our Nation. It is as much a part of our identity as it is a major economic engine. WE built the automobile industry. It would be a financial disaster and a major blow to National pride to watch it wither and die.



Many years ago I spent an afternoon at the home of one of the pioneers of our Automobile industry. That man was John DeLorean. It was one of the most incredibly experiences of my life. To the end of his days, he was still trying to put another car company together. I will never forget walking into his study and looking at all the elaborate drawings, clay models and bits of construction material scattered all around the room. I would point to a piece and ask him what it was. He would launch into an elaborate description of the item, why he was working on it and why it was better than products offered on the market. At one point, he sensed my astonishment and bewilderment at all these creations. Before I had a chance to speak my question, he already knew it. I'll never forget those words: "This is all I know. I still have great ideas (I think) but nobody will listen".



Today there are many talented people like that in the halls of GM, Ford and Chrysler. They have made errors in the past and have openly acknowledged them. They understand the urgent need to adapt and provide smaller, more efficient and most importantly alternate fuel vehicles. They understand the critical National interest in integrating their corporate policies with a cohesive National energy and industrial policy. What is good for the Big 3 is good for America and what is good for America is good for the Big 3. We have a widow of opportunity here to take a quantum leap and rebirth these vital pillars of our economy while restoring our National pride in what is uniquely American: The car and the car culture. I foresee a renewed vibrant industry that will not only export these new products and their technologies to the World, but become a locomotive for the green energy transition around the World.



Thank you for considering my words and I respectfully request you support this inbound legislation inside the Senate, across both aisles and with your Representative counterparts.



Most sincerely,

Christopher P. Rabalais

Houston, Texas

Christopher and Daniela Rabalais's Blog

Christopher and Daniela Rabalais

Working WITH Big Oil

I really believe that the established petroleum industry represents
the only true challenge to implementing the Pickens Plan and awakening
the U.S. and World economy to a new dawn of clean renewable energy.

I think considerably more effort should be applied in this area. I see
no reason to take them on headlong. Their established facilities and
distribution channels are in place. Why reinvent the wheel? Do we
really want to put all these people in the unemployment lines and
start from scratch?… Continue

Posted on April 15, 2009 at 7:45am — 2 Comments

Christopher and Daniela Rabalais

Can you join me?

I just sent a message to my newspaper on why I support a carbon cap.

A majority of Americans support a cap on carbon pollution, but you wouldn't know it from what you read in the papers or see on the news. And right now it's important that our Members of Congress know we aren't fooled by the scare tactics.

Will you send a message to you local paper too? It's really simple -- just use the tool on Al Gore's Repower America website:

http://www.RepowerAmerica.org/page/speakout/carboncap

Thanks!

Posted on April 15, 2009 at 6:08am —

Christopher and Daniela Rabalais

Unfair Health Care System

(letter to the Editor from my Wife)

I relocated to Houston from Costa Rica about 9 months ago. This might sound hard to believe but a third world nation makes the United States health care system look pathetic, unacceptable and cruel to its people. A few people in the U.S are wondering if their country is one step away from socialism by approving Universal Health Care. This speculation is hard to understand. It seems that while many are going broke and loudly screaming for reform, they are stil… Continue

Posted on April 8, 2009 at 6:36am —

Christopher and Daniela Rabalais

Purpose

My faith demands --- this is not optional --- my faith demands that I do whatever I can, wherever I can, whenever I can, for as long as I can with whatever I have to try to make a difference.

-- Jimmy Carter

Posted on April 6, 2009 at 11:38am —

Christopher and Daniela Rabalais

The Future of the SportsRiskIndex® and the SportsFolio℠

March 31, 2009

Chris P. Rabalais
Crystal World Holdings, Inc. (CEO)
Crystal World Markets, LLC (CEO)
1701 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Suite 300
Washington, DC 20006

Dear Shareholders, Directors and Affected Parties:

Circumstances require that I resign my position as President and CEO of Crystal World Holdings, Inc. and Crystal World Markets, LLC effective March 31, 2009. I have decided to take this time to evaluate my current goals and investigate new opportunities. The company development has r… Continue

Posted on April 1, 2009 at 8:32am —

Comment Wall (72 comments)

You need to be a member of PickensPlan to add comments!

Join this Ning Network

At 4:35am on August 15, 2009, Christopher and Daniela Rabalais said…
Thank you for contacting me regarding natural gas. I welcome your thoughts and comments.

Natural gas is a valuable domestic asset that is abundant and cost-effective, and the cleanest-burning fossil-fuel available. The Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) holds undiscovered recoverable reserves of 420 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. With the United States currently consuming natural gas at a rate of roughly 23 trillion cubic feet per year, there is a 20-year supply of domestic natural gas off American shores.

Not only will expanded OCS development move us closer to energy independence, it will strengthen our economy and create stable, well-paying jobs. A December 2008 study conducted by economists and the American Petroleum Institute (API) indicates the potentially broad economic impacts from leveraging these available resources. The study projects that in the year 2030 alone, OCS production would result in more than $8 billion in private sector economic output. It would add nearly 40,000 jobs and $2.3 billion in income for American workers. The benefits of the OCS are clear; now, we must take decisive steps to develop this valuable source of domestic oil and natural gas.

I appreciate hearing from you, and I hope you will not hesitate to contact me on any issue that is important to you.

Sincerely,
Kay Bailey Hutchison
United States Senator

284 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
202-224-5922 (tel)
202-224-0776 (fax)
http://hutchison.senate.gov
At 7:36pm on August 3, 2009, Christopher and Daniela Rabalais said…
Dear Mr. Rabalais:



Thank you for contacting my office regarding energy issues. I appreciate your thoughts on this important matter.



I am committed to reducing the United States' dependency on foreign sources of oil. We cannot rely on unstable regions in the world to supply our energy. Exploring domestic sources of energy will reduce our reliance and drive down our oil and gasoline prices at home. The United States should explore all alternatives to eliminate our foreign energy dependence. This includes developing wind, solar, nuclear, and other practical energy alternatives. But America should also use the abundant energy we have in this country - natural gas, crude oil, and clean coal.



Prohibiting exploration of domestic sources of energy leaves the United States vulnerable to the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries' (OPEC) price fixing. OPEC's control has led to a low supply and high prices of oil over the past few years.



In response to this I have introduced the DRILL NOW Act (H.R. 1143). This bill allows for further exploration of natural resources while rewarding states that want to control their own energy supply and continue respecting the environment. The DRILL NOW Act allows states to decide on drilling off their shores and share in the millions of dollars that are paid by oil and gas companies to the federal government for leases. This will bring more crude oil and natural gas to the US while creating more jobs and would keep American money in America.



I will only support practical legislation that takes advantage of our domestic energy resources without tax increases on the American consumer.


Thank you again for contacting me with your thoughts. For additional information regarding current legislation and my representation of the Second District, please refer to my website at poe.house.gov. While you are visiting the website, be sure to sign up for my electronic newsletter.


God and Texas,











TED POE

Member of Congress

TEXAS



TP\ac


God and Texas,

TED POE
Member of Congress
TEXAS
At 7:00am on July 29, 2009, Christopher and Daniela Rabalais said…
Dear Mr. Rabalais:

Thank you for contacting me about our nation’s energy policy, I appreciate having the benefit of your comments on this issue. Congress must continue to pass common sense, bipartisan legislation that increases domestic energy production, encourages development of renewable and alternative energy, and sets America on a course to energy independence.

Energy prices are a direct result of worldwide demand, and America's ability to stabilize fluctuating prices and ensure energy security is strengthened with increased domestic energy production. On September 30, 2008, President George W. Bush signed into law the Fiscal Year 2009 Consolidated Security, Disaster Assistance, and Continuing Appropriations Act (P.L. 110–329). Included in this measure is a repeal of moratoriums restricting drilling in the Atlantic and Pacific Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) as well as oil shale development in Western states. By not renewing these moratoria, our country has taken an important step to secure our nation’s energy independence and combat rising energy prices. Our nation must fully utilize the vast wealth of our domestic energy resources at home rather than relying on foreign nations, some of which are potentially hostile to the United States. Additionally, I strongly support the responsible exploration of our domestic energy reserves in the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve (ANWR).

Furthermore, while the United States must reduce our reliance on foreign oil by increasing domestic production, the use of renewable and alternative energy is a key element in achieving long-term energy security for the United States. That is why I strongly believe that innovation and technological advances in areas such as clean coal, nuclear, biomass, wind and solar energy play a vital role in meeting our future energy needs. Expanding these energy sources will increase efficiency and promote conservation. Texas is the nation's leading wind energy producer, and I strongly support Texas becoming a leader in all renewable and alternative energy sources. In short, our nation’s energy policy must promote the development of all sources of energy—renewable, alternative, and fossil fuels—while also encouraging fuel efficiency and conservation measures.

You may be certain that I will continue to advocate for comprehensive energy legislation that uses more American natural resources and limits our dependence on foreign sources of oil. For more detailed information regarding energy legislation and policies that I support, I encourage you to visit my website at www.cornyn.senate.gov. I appreciate having the opportunity to represent you in the United States Senate. Thank you for taking the time to contact me.

Sincerely,

JOHN CORNYN
United States Senator





517 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Tel: (202) 224-2934
Fax: (202) 228-2856
http://www.cornyn.senate.gov
At 11:31am on July 23, 2009, Christopher and Daniela Rabalais said…
Dear Mr. Rabalais:

Thank you for your recent letter regarding global climate change legislation. I appreciate having the benefit of your comments on this matter.

As you know, President Barack Obama’s Fiscal Year 2010 budget contains a new national energy tax that would raise energy prices on Texas families by assuming revenues in excess of $650 billion from a cap-and-trade program. Recently, the House of Representatives passed the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (H.R. 2454) which would implement President Obama’s initiative to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. I welcome an open debate on how to be a good steward of our environment; however, I cannot support legislation that would create a massive new government bureaucracy, raise energy prices, increase taxes, and send American jobs overseas. Several analyses show that Texas, as the nation’s leading energy producer and key manufacturing center, would be saddled with a disproportionate amount of the cost to implement a cap-and-trade program. In fact, the Texas Comptroller’s office notes that if H.R. 2454 was enacted, it could cost Texas families a total of $6.9 billion dollars and, in its first year of implementation, displace up to 277,000 Texas jobs.

I strongly believe that innovation and technological advances in areas such as clean coal, nuclear, wind and solar energy, will address our nation's environmental challenges more effectively than proposals, such as H.R. 2454, that create more government regulation and stifle economic development. Furthermore, any effort to control potentially harmful emissions should not put the United States at an economic disadvantage—or penalize American families and workers—by allowing other countries, such as India and China, to ignore environmental considerations in their economic policies. You may be certain that I will work to enact sensible policies that protect our environment while also growing our economy and protecting American jobs.

I appreciate having the opportunity to represent you in the United States Senate. Thank you for taking the time to contact me.

Sincerely,

JOHN CORNYN
United States Senator
At 2:55pm on July 10, 2009, Christopher and Daniela Rabalais said…
Dear Mr. Rabalais:



Thank you for contacting my office regarding energy issues. I appreciate your thoughts on this important matter.



I am committed to reducing the United States' dependency on foreign sources of oil. We cannot rely on unstable regions in the world to supply our energy. Exploring domestic sources of energy will reduce our reliance and drive down our oil and gasoline prices at home. The United States should explore all alternatives to eliminate our foreign energy dependence. This includes developing wind, solar, nuclear, and other practical energy alternatives. But America should also use the abundant energy we have in this country - natural gas, crude oil, and clean coal.



Prohibiting exploration of domestic sources of energy leaves the United States vulnerable to the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries' (OPEC) price fixing. OPEC's control has led to a low supply and high prices of oil over the past few years.



In response to this I have introduced the DRILL NOW Act (H.R. 1143). This bill allows for further exploration of natural resources while rewarding states that want to control their own energy supply and continue respecting the environment. The DRILL NOW Act allows states to decide on drilling off their shores and share in the millions of dollars that are paid by oil and gas companies to the federal government for leases. This will bring more crude oil and natural gas to the US while creating more jobs and would keep American money in America.



I will only support practical legislation that takes advantage of our domestic energy resources without tax increases on the American consumer.


Thank you again for contacting me with your thoughts. For additional information regarding current legislation and my representation of the Second District, please refer to my website at poe.house.gov. While you are visiting the website, be sure to sign up for my electronic newsletter.


God and Texas,











TED POE

Member of Congress

TEXAS



TP\ac


God and Texas,

TED POE
Member of Congress
TEXAS
At 1:41pm on June 28, 2009, Christopher and Daniela Rabalais said…
Thank you for contacting me regarding the American Clean Energy and Security Act. I welcome your thoughts and comments.

In our effort to reduce emissions, I believe we must invest in alternative sources of energy. Wind, solar, nuclear, and biomass are clean, safe and effective sources of power. Their increased use would create thousands of jobs and allow us to produce energy for Americans, by Americans.

Some Members of Congress have expressed their intent to mandate a cap-and-trade policy to be imposed on all Americans. I believe that cap-and-trade would increase energy prices. In 2008, Peter Orszag, who then served as the Director of the Congressional Budget Office, and who now serves as the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, testified before the U.S. Senate’s Committee on Finance on the implications of a cap-and-trade regime. In his testimony, Director Orszag stated, “Under a cap-and-trade program, firms would not ultimately bear most of the costs of the allowances but instead would pass them along to their customers in the form of higher prices.”

For this reason, I believe that a cap-and-trade approach to address climate change would be onerous and would adversely impact the economy. It could create economic hardship for farmers, ranchers, workers and small businesses, in addition to consumers. The last thing our nation needs during this time of economic hardship is higher energy prices and higher levels of unemployment due to a federal mandate passed down from Washington.

As cap-and-trade legislation comes before the Senate, I will keep your comments in mind. I appreciate hearing from you, and I hope you will not hesitate to keep in touch on any issue that is important to you.

Sincerely,
Kay Bailey Hutchison
United States Senator

284 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
202-224-5922 (tel)
202-224-0776 (fax)
http://hutchison.senate.gov
At 6:38am on May 27, 2009, Christopher and Daniela Rabalais said…
Working with “Big Oil” and avoiding the petroleum trap

For the most part, I believe that existing regulation on elements such as price-fixing and anti-trust behavior should go a long way to preventing this. It will be very difficult to monopolize the renewable sources that aren't grown on a farm such as the sun, wind, geothermal and wave technologies. I expect plenty of competition at home and abroad to try and control the intellectual property and manufacturing of these sectors. This is all the more reason we really need to focus here. While I expect it will be very difficult to keep the manufacturing on U.S. soil due to our high labor costs (relative to "Chindia") and our standard of living that depends on high income (by world standards), we should put laser focus on being the innovator and holder of IP rights. There is no reason why licensing fees should not flow into our coffers for many years to come.

I do believe that oil companies are hostage (to a great degree) to the existing foreign suppliers and their cartels. Regarding the control of natural gas supplies in the U.S. and not falling into the same trap domestically that we find ourselves in from foreign oil, it may be wise to take a closer look at the way Federal leases of natural gas supplies are structured. Through the careful delivery and monitoring of these public natural gas supply contracts, we should be able to avoid that pitfall. I would suggest keeping the costs of these leases high and routing that money back into renewables. While I understand that natural gas is a superior domestic alternative to petroleum, it IS a hydrocarbon fuel of finite supply. At best, it will run out eventually. At worst, it will breed a whole new version of the same problem as other nations begin to copy us and burn natural gas instead. This only delays the problem, creates potential new conflicts over natural gas supplies in the future and moves us toward a Venus-like atmosphere… albeit more slowly…

As far as how the engagements with the existing petroleum entities are structured and “who gets what”, I am confident that market forces and deal making by intelligent motivated parties will sort the details of these arrangements effectively.
At 6:36am on May 23, 2009, Christopher and Daniela Rabalais said…
I use a very helpful tool on my BlackBerry called Visible Vote. It allows you to vote on issues before Congress and compare them to the votes of your Members. You can also send messages directly to each Member from your phone. As each new issue comes up, you receive a message so you can weigh in. Each of your votes is sent to your Members as correspondence from a constituent. The application is free.

I am a Progressive Democrat and here is how my votes have compared with each so far:

1. Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison - 50% (6 / 6)
2. Senator John Cornyn - 33% (4 / 8)
3. Representative Ted Poe - 15% (3 / 17)

I would rank them in the same order for their support of the Pickens Plan.

I highly recommend Visible Vote. I see "e-Government" applications like this as the future of governance on a broad scale. Who doesn't carry a smart phone these days?
At 5:52pm on May 22, 2009, Christopher and Daniela Rabalais said…
Thank you for contacting me regarding the fiscal year (FY) 2010 budget. I welcome your thoughts and comments on this issue.

On February 26, 2009, the White House released the President’s budget proposal for FY 2010. The President’s budget, though not binding, is an official suggestion to Congress on how the nation’s money should be spent. Once submitted, Congress has six weeks to act upon the budget proposal. Both the Senate and the House of Representatives pass their respective budget proposals and then conference to approve a single Congressional Budget Resolution.

On April 30, 2009, the Senate passed the Conference Report to accompany S. Con. Res. 13, the Fiscal Year 2010 Budget Resolution. I opposed the $3.5 trillion budget resolution because of its overwhelming size and misplaced priorities.

The $3.5 trillion budget resolution sends the American people an unmistakable message that the federal government will continue to spend recklessly and raise our national debt regardless of our present economic conditions. I joined my colleague, Senator John McCain, in offering a reasonable budget alternative that would have lowered deficits, reduced the public debt by $3.6 trillion more than the President's plan, and capped discretionary spending at baseline levels. The alternative would have fully funded our defense programs, supported our veterans, and extended the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts. Despite our best efforts, our fiscally responsible alternative was defeated.

Although I opposed the Budget Resolution, I did offer three amendments to the Senate version of the resolution. Unfortunately, the Conference Report contained only one of my three amendments. While it did not incorporate my provisions to protect families from the marriage tax penalty and to reduce our country’s dependence on foreign energy sources by encouraging the expansion of oil and gas production on the Outer Continental Shelf, it did include my provision to extend the state and local sales tax deduction.

The nation’s budget should reflect the country's top priorities: promoting job creation for U.S. workers by decreasing taxes, increasing efforts to fight terrorism, lessening the hardship for millions of veterans, and supporting health and education programs. You may be certain that I will work to ensure that America's priorities are adequately funded, while providing the fiscal discipline necessary for short- and long-term economic growth.

I appreciate hearing from you. I hope that you will not hesitate to keep in touch on any issue of concern to you.

Sincerely,
Kay Bailey Hutchison
United States Senator

284 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
202-224-5922 (tel)
202-224-0776 (fax)
http://hutchison.senate.gov
At 7:13am on May 22, 2009, Christopher and Daniela Rabalais said…
http://www.economist.com/business/displayStory.cfm?story_id=13721051&source=features_box_main

I do sincerely hope that we are not disappointed and short-sightedness
and greed win once again. Spiking the price now will only hasten and
strengthen the move to global clean energy policy and innovation.

It seems they've painted themselves into a corner. Minimum budgets were drawn based on continuing high oil prices that can't be sustained.

Tick... tock... tick.. tock
 
 

© 2009   Created by PickensPlan

Badges  |  Community Guidelines  | Report an Issue  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service