Richard Barnard's Groups
RSS
Loading feed
Gifts Received
Richard Barnard has not received any gifts yet
MY HEV(HYBRID ELECTRIC VEHICLE)AND OTHERS ON THE PP ARE HELPING TO TURN OFF THE SPIGOT OF OIL FROM THE MIDDLE EAST.
Profile Information
- Are you interested in becoming an organizer in your area?
- No
- Tell us about your experience with alternative energy:
- I'm Done.
I fought my war against Middle Eastern Terrorism and I won. I helped turn off the spigot of oil from the Middle East. After 35 years my HEV is being built.
The following HEV (hybrid electric vehicle) is the embodiment of every HEV being manufactured today. IT CAN BE BUILT BETTER BY USING MORE KINETIC ENERGY. I have shown this but it isn’t being done.
The automobile manufacturers have the information - CHRYSLER ALREADY HAS THESE PATENTS. THEY REFERENCED ME AS PRIOR ART - (5,999,864 December 7, 1999), (6,073,712 June 13, 2000), (5,962,941 October 5, 1999), (5,884,390 March 23, 1999) AND 6,069,424.
Beginning in 1990 I have been referenced in two of Ford Motor Company’s patents, 1 of Honda's, 3 of GE's, and 14 of Daimler Chrysler's for an Energy Storage Apparatus.
The following URL is the Patents and Trademarks site showing my invention
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITO...
Visit the following URL to view the Drive for Patent 4,597,463
http://home.comcast.net/~richardrb/site/
I invented the HEV beginning 1979. Patent issued 1986.
Patent 4,597,463 shows energy transfer.
My file number 06/546,170 shows the drive.
The ELECTROCOMBUSTIBLE DRIVE ENGINE file number 06/546,170 is shown in the embodiment of Patent 4,597,463
I would like people to energetically, aggressively, nicely push the American Automobile manufacturers to build the HEV (hybrid electric vehicle). This vehicle will reduce consumption of any alternative energy and reduce carbon.
The HEV (hybrid electric vehicle) can use many alternative energies. It is the most flexible automobile available. It’s not being built to use the following with the exception of gasoline/diesel but it can be.
HEV – flex fuel,
HEV – hydrogen (water)
HEV – dirty hydrogen (NG)
HEV – NG
HEV – LNG
HEV – LPG
HEV - CNG
HEV - H2
HEV – E85
HEV – gasoline – not an alternative energy; however it is available. HEV = less consumption
HEV – diesel – not an alternative energy; however it is available. HEV = less consumption
HEV – solar? Future
HEV – plasma? Future
HEV – etc, etc, etc, etc, etc
The HEV – (plug in) can be used with any of the above. If the fuel is combustible it can be used. What the HEV allows is less consumption of any fuel used. None of the alternative energy fuels above are available in quantity. Demand is the problem if we want to wean ourselves off Middle Eastern oil.
The HEV is an EV a hybrid EV. Many people don’t think of it as being an electric vehicle.
The hybrid can be built to be as fast and sturdy as any sports car, SUV or Truck manufactured today. Eaton is currently building a truck for Fed X and others.
MY MISSION STATEMENT
I added this to My Page as a reminder why I got involved beginning 1973 - 1978. My feelings remain the same.
In the comments below “The current activity in the Middle East may cause the death of thousands of our American youth.” was Iraq (1). We lost hundreds in Iraq (1) beginning Aug 2, 1990 in the Gulf War only nine months after this letter was written and subsequently thousands in 911 and Iraq (2). We do not want an Iran (1).
November 9th 1990
Internal Revenue Service
Essie Mahdee
1221 Broadway Room 500
Oakland, California 94612
Re: IRS Information Document Request Letter dated 9/13/90
Dear Ms. Mahdee:
No Liter Research and Development is a company with a Mission Statement that is trying to create a better environment for the world that will help allow its inhabitants to live without fear of death from carcinogens because of current technology. It is an objective of the company to help clean the planet's air and help stop global warming. Another objective of the company is to develop technology that will lower America's trade deficit and allow the sale of product to the world that is manufactured in America that is less dependent on fossil fuels; therefore, making the world less dependent on the Middle East for fossil fuels. It is another objective of the company to help prevent what is now happening in the Middle East. The current activity in the Middle East may cause the death of thousands of our American youth. It is yet another objective of the company to develop technology that will help lower the cost to the American people of product that is now costly because of current technology.
I wish to add that my company had an office audit by the IRS for tax years 1982, 1983, and 1984 and it was determined that the company was run in a businesslike manner.
Very sincerely yours,
Richard Barnard
- What excites you about this campaign?
- Mr. Pickens
- What do you want to do to help?
- Wish everyone good luck
Because Pickens Plan members have asked - The below photos shown are:
A Barnard Coat of arms and Motto
The motto "Bear and Forbear" means - "To patiently bear the blows that must be borne, and abstain from the things and the pleasures we ought to abstain from" "Bear and Forebear" is the english of Epictetus's saying "anexou kai apexou" latin "Sustine Abstine" Sustine - sustain; to endure Abstine - abstain, refrain (from).
Meaning of the name Barnard
A French and English variation of the surname Bernard, is derived from the Germanic given name Bernhard, from the elements ber = bear + hard = brave, hardy. The name was introduced to England by the conquering Normans in 1066 (that was the date William won the battle; the name might have been introduced a day or two later...) Origin: Old German Meaning: Brave / Hard as a bear.
Lancaster Castle – shown above represents my ancestry. Ralph Fitzbernard was the Sheriff of Yorkshire Lancaster Castle.
The Tartan for the Barnard family
The Clan Through the centuries the Barnard family was affiliated with many different clans through marriage. The clan BURNETT claims the BARNARD family as a sept or directly affiliated family, entitled to clan rights including the use of the clan tartan shown here.
I lived at Little Rockford Station Antarctica after arriving at McMurdo from October 1961 through February 1962. I then Wintered Over at McMurdo Sound. I left McMurdo Sound October 1962.
October 1961 - 4 R7V arrived at McMurdo from Christchurch with Admiral Tyree and staff; flight delayed to this date from 30 September by poor weather and storm conditions at McMurdo.
MARCH 5 1962 Naval Air Facility, McMurdo Sound, placed in winter status.
United States Antarctic Research: Report No. 32 to the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR) 1 April 1989 - 31 March 1990 24
LITTLE ROCKFORD
1. 79°30'S, 147°19'W, (relocated in 1959 from 79°35'S, 156°46'W)
2. December 1958 -February 1965
DON'T DESTROY ANTARCTICA WITH CARBON.
Full view of Little Rockford Station Antarctica where I lived for 5 monthe of the summer with four others. My home was a 12 X 20 foot shack shown on the bottom right. All five of us lived in that Shack. We all wintered over at McMurdo Sound.
Find more photos like this on PickensPlan
A Barnard Coat of arms and Motto
The motto "Bear and Forbear" means - "To patiently bear the blows that must be borne, and abstain from the things and the pleasures we ought to abstain from" "Bear and Forebear" is the english of Epictetus's saying "anexou kai apexou" latin "Sustine Abstine" Sustine - sustain; to endure Abstine - abstain, refrain (from).
Meaning of the name Barnard
A French and English variation of the surname Bernard, is derived from the Germanic given name Bernhard, from the elements ber = bear + hard = brave, hardy. The name was introduced to England by the conquering Normans in 1066 (that was the date William won the battle; the name might have been introduced a day or two later...) Origin: Old German Meaning: Brave / Hard as a bear.
Lancaster Castle – shown above represents my ancestry. Ralph Fitzbernard was the Sheriff of Yorkshire Lancaster Castle.
The Tartan for the Barnard family
The Clan Through the centuries the Barnard family was affiliated with many different clans through marriage. The clan BURNETT claims the BARNARD family as a sept or directly affiliated family, entitled to clan rights including the use of the clan tartan shown here.
I lived at Little Rockford Station Antarctica after arriving at McMurdo from October 1961 through February 1962. I then Wintered Over at McMurdo Sound. I left McMurdo Sound October 1962.
October 1961 - 4 R7V arrived at McMurdo from Christchurch with Admiral Tyree and staff; flight delayed to this date from 30 September by poor weather and storm conditions at McMurdo.
MARCH 5 1962 Naval Air Facility, McMurdo Sound, placed in winter status.
United States Antarctic Research: Report No. 32 to the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR) 1 April 1989 - 31 March 1990 24
LITTLE ROCKFORD
1. 79°30'S, 147°19'W, (relocated in 1959 from 79°35'S, 156°46'W)
2. December 1958 -February 1965
DON'T DESTROY ANTARCTICA WITH CARBON.
Full view of Little Rockford Station Antarctica where I lived for 5 monthe of the summer with four others. My home was a 12 X 20 foot shack shown on the bottom right. All five of us lived in that Shack. We all wintered over at McMurdo Sound.
Find more photos like this on PickensPlan
© 2013 Created by PickensPlan.
Powered by
Badges | Community Guidelines | Report an Issue | Terms of Service
Comment Wall (141 comments)
You need to be a member of PickensPlan to add comments!
Join PickensPlan
From: barnardrbb@msn.com
To: av-pt@mail.toyota.co.jp
Subject: RE: The HEV - Tesla and Ford
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 08:01:35 -0700
I just wanted to add a little clarity to my last e-mail. The EEStor battery combines capacitor technology that I’ve been pushing for several years for use with an HEV. Designed for use with an HEV the HEV virtually wouldn’t need to be recharged using conventional 120V or 240V recharging stations. It can be designed; using the combustible engine, to keep the battery recharged with very little fuel used. It should go without saying but I will for clarity - service stations selling fuel wouldn’t have to be redesigned and recharging stations wouldn’t have to be implemented in cities. Carbon emissions would be reduced to a point they wouldn’t be hazardous and the oil companies would still be an important part of the world’s economies.
Please think China and what they are capable of achieving when making your decision. Look at what they’ve done in just the last 10 years. Think about the turmoil in the Middle East and our reliance on them.
Richard Barnard
From: barnardrbb@msn.com
To: av-pt@mail.toyota.co.jp
Subject: RE: The HEV - Tesla and Ford
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 14:59:32 -0700
To: Toyota - hybrid manufacturing
I would recommend you manufacture a plug-in HEV using EEStor, Inc. battery technology. Use the PTO’s “All Elements Rule” to legally manufacture a hybrid battery. A plug-in HEV would be able to get anywhere from 500 miles to 1000 miles to a gallon of any combustible fuel. This should keep the oil companies happy. They would charge an amount per gallon that would equalize/maintain their profits.
I’m familiar with said “All Elements Rule” because it was used by Ford, GM and Eaton to use the lion’s share of elements from both my patent and its drive. You didn’t have to use the “All Elements Ruled”because you waited until after I allowed my patent and its companion drive to abandon. I respect you for that.
I live in Fremont CA if you need assistance building said plug-in HEV
http://www.lockheedmartin.com/news/press_releases/2008/010908_LockheedMartinSignsAgreement.html
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=7595109.PN.&OS=PN/7595109&RS=PN/7595109
Thank you
Richard Barnard
To: (Toyota management – hybrid manufacturing and engineering)
You’re working with Elon Musk (Tesla) in Fremont, CA. You previously worked with GM who was obviously incompetent – no fault of yours. Please talk to Mr. Musk and try to convince him not to be excessively proprietary in his design concept, within your joint venture, manufacturing automobiles. I want Tesla to succeed, with you, in being the primary supplier of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles not just an electric vehicle. Designed properly it can achieve a couple of hundred miles per gallon of any combustible fuel. Toyota and Tesla, with your combined battery technology, can be the world’s leader in manufacturing the plug-in HEV.
As you know I designed the drive (My file number 06/546,170) for patent 4,597,463 now being used in every HEV manufactured. The world wasn’t ready in 1980 with the technology to manufacture the HEV – primarily computer. It took Toyota approximately 17 years beginning in 1980, after I introduced the concept globally, to build your HEV and another 10 years for the consumer to understand the technology which is still somewhat lacking but quickly gaining acceptance.
I am recommending that Toyota and Tesla build the plug-in HEV to recharge using 120V, home charging, not 240V. It won’t need 240V to make it viable. You won’t need multiple recharging devices in a city.
Sincerely yours,
Richard Barnard
Richard Barnard
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT COMMERCE
National Bureau of Standards
Washington, D.C 20234
July 22 1982
Honorable Don Edwards House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515
Dear Mr. Edwards:
Thank you for your July 7 letter enclosing correspondence from your constituent, Mr. Richard Barnard. Mr. Barnard submitted his invention disclosure to OERI in June 1981 and it was accepted for first-stage evaluation, as described in Section 3 of the enclosed synopsis. On July 2, 1981, we informed Mr. Barnard that we were unable to recommend his invention for Government support because the system would not work as claimed. Subsequently, at Mr. Barnard's request, we reviewed his case several times with the same result. Each time, our decision was based on the fact that Mr. Barnard's concept is in violation of the First Law of Thermodynamics; no mathematical analysis was performed.
Sincerely,
George P. Lewett
Chief, Office of Energy-Related Inventions
In the late 70s I had another file number 06/234,632 to Richard Barnard for an (HEV). I show it in file number 06/546,170 submitted to the PTO in 1983. I wrote patent 463 myself and argued it successfully.
I always referenced prior file numbers to the PTO on new applications so all within the PTO would be aware. All prior work was applicable and gave a full disclosure of my work to the PTO for their consideration and relevance.
Richard Barnard
The following are quotes from the DOE describing their current SMR (Small Modular Reactor) program. This is not a new concept.
The Department of Energy (DOE) believes that there is a need and a market in the United States for SMRs. The DOE Office of Nuclear Energy’s Small Modular Reactor program will advance the licensing and commercialization of SMR designs.
The term “modular” in the context of SMRs refers to a single reactor that can be grouped with other modules to form a larger nuclear power plant. SMRs are envisioned to require limited
on-site preparation as they are expected to essentially be ready to “plug and play” when they arrive from the factory. SMRs provide simplicity of design, economies and quality of factory production, and offer more flexibility (financing, siting, sizing, and end-use applications) compared to larger nuclear power plants.
Below shows when portable reactors were first envisioned and used at McMurdo Sound Antarctica beginning in 1961-1962.
Richard
“The DOE’s objectives are to “Solicit, competitively select, and award project(s) with industry partners for cost-sharing the U.S.(NRC) review of design certification document for up to two of the most promising LWR SMR (SMALL MODULAR REACTORS) concept(s) for near-term licensing and deployment.”
It has taken 50 years but it appears what was started in 1961-1962 is going to happen.
The Naval Nuclear Power Unit Detachment @ McMurdo Sound Antarctica operated and maintained the PM-3A Nuclear Power Plant and the water distillation plant. The PM-3A reactor was portable. It arrived at McMurdo Sound October 1961 and went critical about 4 months later 3 March 1962. It only took Martin-Marietta a few months to build it in America put it in a box , so to speak, and ship it to McMurdo Sound Antarctica.
In March 1962, it gained criticality. This was a huge achievement for Martin Company. It had designed, manufactured, transported and assembled a nuclear power plant in less than three years.
The desire to build a nuclear plant in Antarctica had political motivations as well. The study suggested that an Antarctic reactor would be an excellent demonstration of the President's new "Atoms for Peace" program. It came at a time when the United States had a fascination with all things nuclear, and the federal government was willing to spend millions on any project relating to nuclear power.
President Kennedy, Colonel L. Fletcher Prouty and McNamara thought small Nuclear Power Plants at the time was a good idea. What better place to test the idea then the South Pole. Colonel Prouty envisioned installations in American neighborhoods and along our coastlines.
I’m one of the few that has drank distillated water from otherwise wasted heat from a nuclear power plant while I was stationed at McMurdo Sound Antarctica - Deep Freeze 62.
Richard
From: RICHARD BARNARD
Sent: Fri 4/23/10 9:08 AM
To: Alexander Cutler@eaton.com
Cc: Mark@Eaton.com
Mr. Cutler:
In 2006 I recommended that Eaton (engineer/design) an energy storage device using your capacitor technology. It has been designed and Lockheed Martin now has proprietary ownership. Using the Patent and Trademarks “All Elements Rule” it shouldn’t be difficult to hijack key elements and come up with an alternative device.
An HEV plug-in would be able to get approximately 400 to 600 miles to a gallon of diesel, CNG or any other fuel using this capacitor configuration.
It’s said the battery will charge in minutes and provide a range of 500 miles.
Check out EEStor who holds the patents that Lockheed Martin now controls.
EEStor, Inc., of Cedar Park, TX
http://www.lockheedmartin.com/news/press_releases/2008/010908_LockheedMartinSignsAgreement.html
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=7595109.PN.&OS=PN/7595109&RS=PN/7595109
I sent the following to Kevin and Mark 2006.
From: Richard Barnard
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2006 10:12 AM
To: 'McGuire'
Cc: Kevin@eaton.com
Subject: Eaton's HEV
Dear Mr. McGuire:
I have shown Eaton in my patent 4,597,463 file number 546,170 - it’s drive. Both are the embodiment of your HEV. I understand the “ALL ELEMENTS RULE”. Eaton and General Motors have made it clear. I’m not trying to revive any claim or want anything. I just want the HEV built properly. The only thing I didn’t show was use of capacitors when I wrote my patent and its companion drive. The use of capacitors with the battery will enhance energy storage thus increasing the HEV’s use of electricity in lieu of combustible fuel. Have your automobile engineers work with Eaton’s electrical division to finish the HEV.
Richard Barnard
The reactor was designed, manufactured and assembled by Martin Company (now Lockheed-Martin) for $4,000,000.00, and was named the PM-3A. It was the third in the line of portable, medium output reactors. The plant had a net output of 1250 Kw and was designed to be to fit in a C-130 (Hercules) aircraft, but was transported to McMurdo by ship. On top of producing electricity, it also ran a water distillation plant with otherwise wasted heat. It was fuelled by Strontium-90 pellets, one of the most dangerous fuels for a nuclear reactor because of it's high radioactivity before it enter the reactor core.
The plant was transported to McMurdo in 1961, and was assembled and tested over the next year. In March 1962, it gained criticality. This was a huge achievement for Martin Company. It had designed, manufactured, transported and assembled a nuclear power plant in less than three years.
The desire to build a nuclear plant in Antarctica had political motivations as well. The study suggested that an Antarctic reactor would be an excellent demonstration of the President's new "Atoms for Peace" program. It came at a time when the United States had a fascination with all things nuclear, and the federal government was willing to spend millions on any project relating to nuclear power.
If you think about it - that was really amazing. Are we going to be allowed to do it again? We need to deploy a proven method of water distillation and a proven method of clean electrical power.
Richard Barnard
According to the final report the plant first went critical on 3 March 1962 and the first usable electricity was delivered to McMurdo on 10 July 1962. The Navy was officially authorized to operate the plant on 27 May 1964. The plant was shutdown during calendar year 1973 pending the resolution of the interconnect leak and chloride stress corrosion problems. In October of 1973 the decision was finalized to remove the plant.
22-26 October 1972 -- reactor critical
26 October 1972 - reactor shutdown
01 July 1973 - defueling procedure initiated
05 July 1973 - defueling successfully completed
06 July - 09 October PM-3A in cold iron status
10 Oct 1973 - Initiated PM-3A removal plan
I was at McMurdo when all the contaminated dirt/rock was removed from Ob Hill and I was at Port Hueneme when it arrived on the ship. Some of it was in 55 gallon drums and some was in the hold. Most of it was buried in the boondocks of CBC Port Hueneme and it's still there. They buried it in a big pit. Put blacktop over it and made it into a parking lot.
Two years ago I went to a PM-3A/NNPU reunion in Bay Saint Louis, Mississippi. It was nice to see all those guys again. This past May in Biloxi Miss one of our guest speakers was Captain Chuck Fegley who was the OIC during DF-64 as a LT.
Billy-Ace
New Zealand wouldn’t allow us to land in their ports while transporting the contaminated - dirt/rock because of radiation fears. It was fear at the time born of ignorance.
Richard Barnard
TOYOTA Patent
5,635,805 Hybrid vehicle
Inventors: Ibaraki; Ryuji (Toyota, JP), Taga; Yutaka (Aichi-ken, JP), Kawashima; Yoshihiro (Okazaki, JP) Assignee: Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha (Toyota, JP)
Appl. No.: 08/495,763 Filed: June 26, 1995
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2Fsearch-adv.htm&r=0&f=S&l=50&d=PALL&Query=ref/4597463
To: av-pt@mail.toyota.co.jp
Subject: RE: HEV Patent 4,597,463
Date: Sun, 2 May 2010 10:04:18
Your hybrid division may be interested in seeing what T. Boone Pickens is doing to enhance use of CNG in America. You may have heard of the Pickens Plan. It is a movement by billionaire T. Boone Pickens to get America energy independent. I have pasted the URL for my page below.
http://push.pickensplan.com/profile/Richard89
Richard Barnard
To: av-pt@mail.toyota.co.jp
Subject: HEV Patent 4,597,463
Date: Sun, 2 May 2010 09:15:02 -0700
I was wondering how your battery technology Is coming along. Are your engineers designing capacitors to enhance storage for the HEV? Are your engineers designing use of kinetic energy and it’s transfer to enhance energy storage? What alternative fuels are you designing the HEV to use? From 1998 to now your company really hasn’t done much to enhance my HEV. Our world needs help. Maybe Japan is comfortable with your imports of carbon fuels. Design a CNG Plug-in HEV.
Richard Barnard
To: av-pt@mail.toyota.co.jp
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2005 8:57 AM
Subject: Re: abandoned US patent 4597463 Hybrid - to Richard Barnard
I submitted my concept to your company in early 1980. Toyota didn't respond. I received my patent July 1, 1986. I allowed it to be abandoned late 1998. Toyota has been manufacturing and selling many elements of my concept. I understand you have no obligation to me. The honorable thing to do would be to say thank you. I am grateful because it will do the things I always envisioned for our common home - earth. It isn't a total solution - it is a beginning. It can be built to use less combustible fuel by using more kinetic energy and adding capacitors. It couldn't be built in 1983 when I first started writing the patent because our computer technology wasn't developed enough to do the things I envisioned.
Thank you for building it
Richard Barnard
Eaton’s hybrid systems have collectively accumulated more than 30 million miles of clean, reliable service throughout the world. They have more than 2,400 Eaton hybrid systems in use today are on delivery trucks, buses, refuse and utility vehicles and other commercial applications.
Of the 30 million miles accumulated, FedEx alone, operator of the largest fleet of commercial hybrid parcel delivery trucks in the United States, accounts for more than five million miles on its Eaton-powered hybrid trucks and vans.
In addition - Eaton provides hybrids for Peterbilt, Kenworth, Freightliner, Iveco, DAF, Daimler, and Ford and on bus models from Foton, Zhongtong, Yutong, JNP, King Long, Shen Long, Heng Tong, BCI and Solaris. Additionally in 2009, Peterbilt began offering customers a refuse truck with Eaton’s HLA® hydraulic hybrid power system, and Eaton was selected to provide nearly 400 plug-in hybrid utility vehicles as part of a U.S. Department of Energy grant under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, the largest US deployment of plug in hybrid commercial vehicles to date.
Richard
--
Tai W. Robinson
Intergalactic
www.AmericanFuelVehicles.com
801-201-7370
MADE-IN-USA renewable energy products & cleaner fuel options that work with today's infrastructure and beyond. We build multi-fuel, hydrogen (H2), methane (CNG), propane (LPG), electric (EV, HEV & PHEV), biodiesel (B100), SVO and ethanol (E85) automobiles, appliances and infrastructure. We promote the cleaner, safer, local fuels through educational workshops and engineering consultation. Reduce your footprint on the planet with American Fuel Vehicles (AFV's) and declare your energy independence.
http://push.pickensplan.com/profiles/blogs/2187034:BlogPost:1440748
Make it a Plug In.
It’s said the battery will charge in minutes and provide a range of 500 miles. If Lockheed Martin keeps it we may never see it again.
EEStor, Inc., of Cedar Park, TX
http://www.lockheedmartin.com/news/press_releases/2008/010908_LockheedMartinSignsAgreement.html
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=7595109.PN.&OS=PN/7595109&RS=PN/7595109
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&RefSrch=yes&Query=PN%2F7033406
http://www.cleanbreak.ca/2009/04/22/eestor-announces-permittivity-certification-now-what/
Yeah my page was too full of stuff and I thought I'd eliminate some of the clutter.
I think the bloom box is a great step in the direction of decentralized energy and in the direction of a hydrogen fuel economy. One of it's big advantages is that the materials are pretty cheap and so an affordable home unit is definitely feasible although I can't speculate on specific numbers.
Work is advancing on new superconductor motots and batteries!
Hello Richard,
I don't know about influence, but maybe we can talk about your invention on The Green Revolution Show. It would be easier for me to talk with you on the telephone. My number is; 760-961-1312, or you can send your number to; jwnobles1@verizon.net and I will call you.
Thanks,
John
View All Comments