PickensPlan

Mike Johnston

Frequently Asked Questions About Converting Vehicles to Operate on Natural Gas

Frequently Asked Questions About
Converting Vehicles to Operate on Natural Gas


Note: I copied this document from the website of Natural Gas Vehicles For America and there is no copyright asserted so I assume it is ok to post it like this. Here is a link to the original document in .pdf form. MJ

The rising cost of gasoline and diesel fuel is prompting many people to investigate options to retrofit (“convert”)
their car or pick-up truck to run solely on natural gas (referred to as “dedicated”) or to run on gasoline OR natural
gas (referred to as “bi-fuel). This document answers the basic questions most often posed to NGVAmerica about
this topic including: conversion system availability; installation, service and warranty issues; costs; and available
tax credits. This document does not address conversion of medium- and heavy-duty vehicles over 10,000 pounds
GVWR such as shuttles, buses and/or work trucks.

“Conversion” System Availability

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has rules concerning the manufacture, sale and installation of
alternative fuel engine conversion systems. In California, similar and even more stringent emission rules and
guidelines have been established by the state’s Air Resources Board (CARB). As allowed under federal law, some
states have adopted or have announced they will adopt the CARB guidelines. These include: Arizona, Colorado,
Connecticut, Florida, Maine, Massachusetts, Maryland, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon,
Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Utah, Vermont, Washington These rules apply to both natural gas- and propanepowered
engine retrofit systems, and will presumably apply to ethanol and/or hydrogen retrofit systems if/when
they are ever approved. Only EPA and/or CARB-certified conversion systems are permitted to be installed on
vehicles manufactured since 1994 (when EPA first addressed the issue of conversion systems). [Per EPA directive
concerning conversion of vehicles manufactured prior to 1994, the owner/installer should not do anything that
they believe – using reasonable judgment – would diminish the vehicles emissions performance – See EPA’s web
site for further clarification on this issue]. While a variety of non-certified systems are sold on the Internet and/or
offered by some automotive shops, EPA has taken the position that installation of these systems is “tampering
with a federally approved emission control system,” a federal violation punishable by a substantial financial
penalty (more than $5000/day). Many of these non-certified systems are allowed in other countries that have less
strict vehicle emissions and safety laws.

To obtain EPA and/or CARB certification for a specific engine or engine family, manufacturers of retrofit
systems (referred to as Small Volume Manufacturers – SVM) must submit a converted vehicle to EPA or CARB
for rigorous testing along with substantial technical documentation. This testing assures that the retrofitted vehicle
meets the same stringent emissions requirements the original equipment manufacturers (OEM) -- e.g., GM and
Ford --met when they submitted their gasoline or diesel-powered vehicle for certification. The testing also ensures
that the retrofit system works seamlessly with the OEM’s on-board diagnostics (OBD) system to indicate when
emissions are outside of approved parameters and to log those anomalies in the computer memory for
downloading by the automotive service technician. Non-certified systems usually do not meet this important
criterion and will fail state or local emissions tests. The process of engineering, manufacturing, installing, pretesting
and then submitting a proposed retrofit system to an EPA- or CARB-approved laboratory for certification
is a time-consuming and expensive process that may cost as much as $200,000 or more per engine family. SVMs
recoup this R&D investment by amortizing the cost across the expected sales volume, adding it to the price they
charge for the various components (computer control module, regulator, injectors, high-pressure hoses and
fittings, etc).

A retrofit system certification applies to a specific engine for specific model year, e.g. 2008 GM 6.0L engine
family “XYZ”, which applies to several – but not all – 2008 GM vehicles with a GM 6.0L engine. Furthermore,
this certification applies only to the installation of that system for a limited time period (e.g. installations
completed during the 2008 calendar year). SVMs may opt to ‘carry-over” their certifications into future years by
filing additional documentation and paying a fee, thus allowing them to convert a previous model-year vehicle
(for which they obtained certification) in later years (e.g. carry-over of a 2007 certification to allow conversion of
a 2007 vehicle in 2008). This decision to carry over a certification is usually based on the SVM’s projected sales
volume.

Due to the technical difficulty and the expense, only a few SVMs have elected to go through the EPA- and/or
CARB-certification process and, even then, only for a limited number of engine families and applicable vehicle
models. Currently, there are only four SVMs offering EPA- certified systems (two have CARB certifications) for
four GM and Ford light-duty engine families covering about twenty vehicle models. These include the GM 6.0L
engine and the Ford 4.6L, 5.4L and 6.8L engines. Currently, there are no natural gas engine conversion systems
available in the U.S. for any other light-duty vehicle brands -- although American Honda does manufacture the
natural gas Civic GX at their East Liberty, Ohio plant. [Note: Additional medium- and heavy-duty engines are
available]. An up-to-date list of ALL currently available EPA- and CARB-certified engine retrofit and repower
systems – and the contact info for the SVMs - is available at the following link:
http://www.ngvamerica.org/pdfs/marketplace/MP.Analyses.NGVs-a.pdf . As new certifications are granted, this
list will be updated as will the SVM contact information.

Installation

Installation of an engine conversion package and fueling system may be done after the vehicle has been in service
or when the vehicle is first purchased. EPA and CARB require that SVMs provide appropriate documentation
and training to installers of their systems, commonly referred to as “qualified system retrofitters” (QSR).
Installation by a non-qualified installer could damage the retrofit equipment or the engine (or both), compromise
vehicle performance, or render the vehicle unsafe to operate. No EPA- or CARB-certified engine conversion
systems are sold to untrained/unapproved installers. This is not a “kit” you buy and install in your own garage or
have installed by the local untrained mechanic. Some SVMs prefer to install their systems themselves at their
corporate facilities while other SVMs choose not to install their own equipment – opting instead to sell their
systems only through QSRs. Typically, the QSR is responsible for obtaining the fuel storage system components
(cylinders, high-pressure tubing, pressure release device (PRD), brackets, protective plates, etc) and installing
these components in accordance with the National Fire Protection Association’s (NFPA) Vehicular Fuel Systems
Code (NFPA 52).

NGVAmerica does not maintain a list of QSRs. Contact the SVMs for information about the QSR that is closest
to you. Automotive shops interested in becoming a QSR should contact the SVMs directly to inquire about the
technical, equipment and financial capabilities/resources they require and the process to become one of their
QSRs.

Service and Warranty Issues

Generally, vehicle warranties offered by the original automotive manufacturer (OEM) are not affected by the
installation of an engine retrofit system, with the exception that the engine warranty for all items related directly
to the retrofit system which will now be covered by the SVM. The OEM’s warranty on non-engine-retrofitsystem-
related items (e.g., a defective lock, leaking power steering pump) remains in force. Many OEM dealers
are unfamiliar with NGV retrofit systems and logistics, and may errantly tell customers that the “vehicle
warranty” will be voided, but this is inaccurate. Courts have upheld the OEM’s non-engine-retrofit-systemrelated
warranty obligations.

Because natural gas engines work essentially the same way as gasoline engines -- i.e. an air-fuel mixture is
injected into the head or directly into the combustion chamber and ignited by a sparkplug -- most engine service
issues are very similar and can be handled by the OEM dealer or local automotive service shop. These include oil
changes, air filter changes etc. If and when a retrofit system-related service issue arises (e.g., a faulty injector or
loose compression fitting), the SVM usually recommends that a QSR perform this work, or, in the case of the
SVM that installs the system themselves, a local SVM-trained OEM dealer or automotive shop will be
recommended.

Occasional inspection of all vehicle systems is generally good practice, regardless of fuel type. NHTSA, the
federal agency with jurisdiction concerning vehicle safety, requires that all CNG fuel storage cylinders have a
label that (1) states the date of manufacture and the date that the cylinder is required to be removed from service
(typically 15-20 years), and (2) instructs the vehicle owner/operator to have a qualified visual inspection of the
tank every 36,000 miles or every 3 years (whichever occurs first) and/or after an accident or fire. Converters and
vehicle owners should have documentation that this safety inspection has been done. Inspections are performed to
look for tank and bracket damage (e.g. gouges, cuts, abrasions, dents, corrosion, rust, general wear, etc). Qualified
cylinder inspectors are located throughout the US and Canada. The cost/time associated with a cylinder inspection
is minimal. More information about CNG cylinder inspections and links to certified inspectors is available at
http://www.cleanvehicle.org/technology/cylinder.shtml. Always check with the SVM and/or the QSR concerning
recommended service practices and warranty coverage.

Costs of Converting a Vehicle to Run on Natural Gas

The cost of converting a vehicle to run on natural gas includes the SVM’s retrofit system, fuel tanks and related
tubing/brackets, and the installation. The amount of fuel capacity requested by the customer (and thus the number,
type, dimensions and configuration of the fuel tanks) significantly impacts cost since CNG cylinders are
expensive.

For most people, an important consideration is whether the net costs associated with converting a vehicle to run
on natural gas (after all costs, grants and/or tax credits are taken into account) will be recouped in fuel savings
over the remaining life of the vehicle. Generally, it is not cost-effective to convert an older vehicle unless it has
plenty of mileage left and will now be driven enough to recoup the investment in fuel savings. For this reason,
SVMs generally do not carry over their previous model year certifications more than one or two years. For
example, none of the light-duty SVMs currently offer EPA- or CARB-certified conversion systems for vehicles
earlier than 2006. However, if a fleet operator requested the retrofit of 30 of their 2005 pick-up trucks, the SVM
with the specific 2005 certification might be persuaded to incur the cost of re-filing with EPA or CARB.

A more common occurrence is the retrofit of a new vehicle. Conversion of new vehicles provides the greatest
opportunity to save fuel cost and, thereby, pay back the conversion cost and generate life-cycle savings.
While NGVAmerica recommends that potential customers contact the appropriate SVMs directly about vehicle
conversion costs, the following are general “ballpark” estimates of retail light-duty vehicle conversion costs
provided by SVMs. Specific quotes will vary based on fuel capacity, number of vehicles, wheel base, etc.

Crown Vic/Lincoln Town Car/Mercury Marquis with 13 gasoline gallon equivalent (GGE): $13,500
E350 Cargo/Passenger Van with 20 GGE fuel: $15,500
F150/250/350 Pick-up Truck with 20 GGE: $16,500; with 30 GGE: $18,500
E450 Cutaway Shuttle Van with 24-38 GGE: $18,500-22,500
Sierra/Silverado 1500/2500HD Pick-up Truck with 11GGE: $12,500; with 20GGE: $15,500
Savanna/Express G1500/2500 Cargo/Passenger Van 12-20GGE: $12,500-16,000

Tax Credits Offset Part of Vehicle Conversion Cost

The federal Energy Policy Act of 2005 included an income tax credit that offsets 50-80% of the buyer’s
incremental cost of purchasing a new dedicated NGV and -- especially important to the discussion here -- also
applies to the cost to convert an existing vehicle to operate on natural gas. For a conversion, the “incremental
price” is the full cost of the conversion. The credit applies only to a dedicated NGV. Furthermore, it only applies
to EPA- or CARB-certified OEM vehicles or EPA- or CARB-certified SVM retrofit systems. The credits are
applicable to NGVs placed in service after December 31, 2005 (which includes previous gasoline-fueled vehicles
placed in service prior to December 31, 2005 but converted to CNG after December 31, 2005). The tax credit
does NOT apply to non-EPA-/non-CARB-certified vehicles, nor does it apply to bi-fuel vehicles, nor does it
apply to the purchase of used/existing CNG vehicles.

The amount of the tax credit is determined by two basic criteria: the vehicle’s gross vehicle weight rating and the
EPA- or CARB certification level. Dedicated NGVs certified to the minimum federal level qualify for 50% of the
incremental cost (within the cap) while “extra clean” vehicles given an extra 30% “bonus” for a total of 80% of
their incremental cost (again, within the cap for that GVWR group). The four GVWR groups and applicable
incremental cost caps are:

GVWR up to 8500#: Incremental cost capped at $5000: Credits from $2500 to $4000
GVWR 8501# - 14,000#: Incremental cost capped at $10,000: credits from $5000-$8000
GVWR 14,001# - 26,000#: Incremental cost capped at $25,000; Credits from $12,500-$20,000
GVWR over 26,000#: Incremental cost capped at $40,000: credits from $20,000-$32,000

All sedans and most vans and pick-up trucks will fall into the first GVWR group, but there are many “beefed up”
pick-up trucks and vans that have GVWRs between 8500-10,000# and thus would qualify for the higher “second
tier” federal tax credit.

In addition, there may be a STATE tax credit available for converting a vehicle to natural gas. These tax credits
are state-specific and some are temporary in nature (e.g., while funds last, first 200 vehicles). Check with your
appropriate state taxation office concerning availability of state tax credits. We suggest that you search the
Internet under “alt fuel vehicles tax credits (your state).”

Below are a few examples of the FEDERAL tax credits available for sedans, vans and pick-up trucks.

American Honda Civic GX: $4000 (dedicated OEM-produced NGV ; GVWR <8500# so incremental cost
cap is $5000, CARB SULEV-certified so qualifies for 80% credit: .8 x $5000 = $4000)
BAF Crown Victoria sedan: $4000 (dedicated NGV; GVWR <8500# so incremental cost capped at
$5000; CARB SULEV certified so it qualifies for 80% credit; .8 x $5000 = $4000
BAF Technologies Ford E350 Passenger van: $8000 (dedicated NGV; GVWR = 9600# so incremental
cost cap is $10,000; CARB SULEV certified so it qualifies for 80% credit: .8 x $10,000 = $8000)
Baytech Silverado C1500 pick-up truck: $4000 (dedicated NGV; GVWR <8500# so incremental cost
capped at $5000; CARB SULEV certified so it qualifies for 80% credit: .8 x $5000 = $4000)
Baytech Silverado C2500HD pick-up truck: $8000 (dedicated NGV; GVWR 8700/9100 so incremental
cost capped at $10,000; CARB SULEV certified so it qualifies for 80% credit: .8 x 10,000 = $8000)
IMPCO Silverado C1500 bi-fuel pick-up truck: $0 (bi-fuel vehicles don’t qualify for federal tax credits –
may qualify for some states incentives)

More information about the available FEDERAL tax incentives for purchase of new NGVs and conversions is
available at: http://www.ngvc.org/pdfs/FederalVehicleTaxCredit0508.pdf

If converting your vehicle to run on natural gas is not an option – either because an EPA-/CARB-certified system
is not available or the economics don’t make sense, NGVAmerica suggests that you investigate the option of
purchasing a used NGV. Government agencies have been the largest purchasers of light-duty NGVs, and many
sell their vehicles after reaching a specific age or mileage benchmark. Examples include federal, state and local
government agencies, airport and transit authorities (light-duty sedans and pick-up trucks are often used by their
security, route supervisor and/or maintenance personnel). While these vehicles do not qualify for the vehicle
purchase tax credit because they were already placed in service, they are often low-cost and have remaining life
on them for you to garner fuel savings.

NGVAmerica does not maintain a list of vehicle auctioneers or resellers of used NGVs but we are aware that
many of the NGVs being purchased by consumers are used government vehicles. Again, we suggest that you
search the Internet under “CNG vehicles used auction.” The federal government (GSA) site for auctions is
http://www.autoauctions.gsa.gov/index.cfm

Fueling Your CNG Vehicle

Before you convert your vehicle to run on natural gas – or purchase a used CNG vehicle, be sure to investigate
your fueling options. While there are over 1000 CNG fueling locations in the U.S., many (about one-half) are not
open to the public. Instead, they are restricted to use only by the fleet operator (referred to as private access
stations). Others allow public refueling only after an account and “charge” card account have been established
(referred to as limited public access), while still others allow public fueling with convenient credit card and/or
proprietary billing card access (referred to as full public access). Many of these existing CNG stations were
originally installed by natural gas utilities and, thus, are in “clusters” associated with their service territories.
Some gas utilities left the market, either closing their stations or selling them to a small cadre of independent
retail CNG fuel companies that have built upon these networks and added new stations. The most comprehensive
lists of CNG stations are available from the following web sites (Note: There are no consistent
reporting/registration requirements when new stations are opened so the following sites may be incomplete):

http://www.eere.energy.gov/afdc/fuels/natural_gas_stations.html (U.S. DOE- maintained site of U.S. stations)
http://www.cngvc.org/ngv/cngvc.nsf/bytitle/fuellocator.htm (Calif. NGV Coalition site of CA fueling locations)
http://www.cleancarmaps.com/home/ (WestStart/CALSTART- maintained web site)

It is always a good idea to contact the station prior to your trip to make sure that the information on the station
lists noted above is accurate and current. This is especially true if you plan to make a trip that is out of your local
area network and when only a very limited infrastructure is in place.

If a CNG fueling site is not available in your immediate area or within reasonable distance from your regularly
traveled route to work, school or other frequented location, you may elect to purchase and install a fueling device
at your home. Currently, the only home fueling devices available are two types of units from FuelMaker
Corporation (http://www.fuelmaker.com).

One type of device that is available across the country is the FuelMaker “Q” series vehicle refueling appliance
(VRA), the least expensive of which is referred to as the “small Q.” It compresses and dispenses about 0.9
gasoline-gallon-equivalent (GGE) per hour…. This is a “time-fill” fueling device that has no storage other than
the storage onboard your vehicle. Gas from the same supply lines that feed your house’s appliances (furnace,
water heater, stove, etc) is compressed and stored onboard your vehicle by a device about the size of an outdoor
house air-conditioning unit that is installed outdoors, usually adjacent to your garage. Fueling is accomplished
overnight or whenever you vehicle is idle and available to attach to the VRA’s supply hose. It is possible to
purchase storage and fast-fill dispensing capability from FuelMaker (which provides much more fueling
capacity), but this option is not designed for, nor is it cost-effective for most homeowners. A “small Q” with
time-fill capability costs about $9875 + installation. Visit FuelMaker’s website for FMQ dealer contacts by state.
Another FuelMaker device called the Phill was introduced in limited areas of the country several years ago, and
has been gradually offered in more markets as demand and service/supply/installer networks have been
established. The Phill is a small home compression/dispensing unit that dispenses about 0.42GGE per hour. It is
also a time-fill device, but it has been engineered to be smaller (about the size of a pay telephone box) and
installed inside your garage with proper safety-relief venting to the outside. The Phill is priced at approximately
$4500+ installation but this device is available only in very limited areas at this time. Even in states like
California where the Phill installation/service network is in place, NGVAmerica suggests that you contact your
local gas company FIRST to make sure that adequate gas supplies and service are available. Visit the Phill
portion of FuelMaker’s web site to find out IF this device is available in your area and – if so, who is qualified to
install it.

Home CNG refueling devices qualify for a federal tax incentive of $1000 and may qualify for additional state tax
incentives or grant subsidies. More information about the available FEDERAL tax incentive is available at the
following link: http://www.ngvc.org/pdfs/FederalInfrastruct.pdf. For information about potential STATE tax
incentives and/or grant subsidies for your home refueling installation, contact your appropriate state authority or
search the Internet under “CNG+refueling+tax incentives.”

We appreciate the public’s interest in taking advantage of the clean burning, domestic-energy-secure, importedoil-
displacement, fuel efficient and cost-effective benefits of NGVs, we are inundated with calls and e-mails
requesting assistance. We hope that this document answers most, if not all, your questions. If your question was
NOT answered by this document, then e-mail us so we can answer it and then include it in revised versions of this
informational document. PLEASE DO NOT CALL US TO ASK WHY AN EPA- OR CARB-CERTIFICATION
IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR YOUR VEHICLE OR WHY THE CERTIFICATION PROCESS IS SO
TECHNICALLY CHALLENGING OR EXPENSIVE. WE HAVE NO AUTHORITY/JURISDICTION OVER
THE PROCESS, NOR DO WE HAVE ANY INFLUENCE IN THESE POLICIES.

Stephe Yborra
Director of Communications & Marketing
NGVAmerica
syborra@ngvamerica.org

Disclaimer: This document was prepared for informational purposes only. It has been made available with the understanding that the
publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other professional service. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required,
the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Tags: conversions, cost, fueling, gas, home, natural, pickens, plan, vehicles

Share  Twitter

Comment

You need to be a member of PickensPlan to add comments!

Join this Ning Network

Jim Cox Comment by Jim Cox on October 22, 2008 at 4:01pm
CCrosby, I am not sure if you meant to the say NG depletion chart. If so I believe as does Mr. Pickens you are wrong about NG reserves depleting but I believe that they are reserves yet to be put on line and are likely to increase in the next couple of years. And this about fertilizer stock what is this all about???????
D. O'Neal Comment by D. O'Neal on July 22, 2008 at 5:29am
Craig, The Pickens plan doesn't appear to be an increase in Nat Gas use, but rather a redistribution of its use. Wind can pick up where Nat Gas electric generation is used. Nat Gas, from my research is one of the most costly ways to produce electricity, and a waste of it's use.
Pickens is due on C-span , in hearings at 9:30c this morning. These are congressional energy hearings, if I understand correctly.
D. O'Neal Comment by D. O'Neal on July 22, 2008 at 5:18am
Oil companies don't really have an interest in building new refineries. We are heading for the back side of the Hubberts Peak , bell curve, and worldwide oil extraction will soon be dropping. (there is much controversy over the Hubberts theory) Bottom line is if there soon isn't as much to refine, why build refineries? Nat Gas, is also a stop gap for another 25 years (give or take) and I may be wrong, but it seems auto companies are doing a lot of research into hydrogen. It could be the fuel that changes the world, and no emissions when burned. The EPA would be a useless entity, as far as hydrogen goes.
I do have an interest in running Nat Gas/ Gasoline bi-fuel vehicles, though in the interim.
THOMAS B. KISER Comment by THOMAS B. KISER on July 21, 2008 at 11:20am
OVERLY RESTRICTIVE REGULATIONS IS AN ATTEMPT TO STIFFEL THIS
AS A VIABLE ALTERNATIVE. ARGENTINA HAS DONE THIS, BUT THEY AREN'T HAMPERED BY AMERICAN POLITIC,S
TOM KISER, SIERRA VISTA AZ.
Craig Crosby Sr Comment by Craig Crosby Sr on July 21, 2008 at 9:46am
Folks:
Natural gas as automobile sounds like a good idea until you see the depletion charts. We cannot keep afloat using natural gas as a fuel. Other than slightly less carbon emission, it is a dead end. Besides, it is more important as fertilizer stock, and we need to preserve as much as we can.
D. O'Neal Comment by D. O'Neal on July 21, 2008 at 7:07am
A statement that I read in (I believe it was the book "Beyond Oil") was something like this.

Realizing that we are heading to the back side down slope of 'Hubberts Peak', and less oil would become available, what sense its there in building new refineries ? Especially at the cost of doing so! (heavily paraphrased)

The logic made sense to me. We hit the top in oil production in the USA in the '70's and worldwide production is proposed to be dropping off about 2015. There is much dispute regarding this, but if true, we have no options except to change our energy ways.
JMiller Comment by JMiller on July 20, 2008 at 9:50am
I do think that EPA's standards are too stringent. I viewed Barbara Boxer trying to blame the U.S.'s lack of sufficient refineries on the people who wanted to build another refinery of "not trying hard enough" to get past the standards. *rolls eyes*
There is a fee that amounts to approximately $7 million dollars for the privilege of building a refinery,,and it takes years to recover that initial cost.
And, now, environmental radicals want to stop solar and wind farms.
It's long past time to put our foot down and say, NO MORE!
When it becomes more important to stop traffic along a major highway in California to allow for a migrating fly to cross over, than it is to keep farm families in business who are growing our hometown food source (which should be the U.S. food source),,the whole thing is backwards!
D. O'Neal Comment by D. O'Neal on July 19, 2008 at 2:17pm
Good info John D! I am considering the same in the Chi-town area. I posted my e-mail on the earlier post and it would be good to swap info, however I must admit I am green at this, and giving myself a crash course as I go. I have amechanic chomping on the bit to get this or something similar off the ground, and in time with recourses and suppliers, it may come reality. For now though, more research. The maps show limited filling facilities even in this big city, but my real interest is to run dual fuel, with home refueling for the Nat Gas.
My original interest was in hydrogen, but there were too many hurdles, and it may be an option in a few years , but not yet. It seems the Nat Gas concept is a good stopgap .

D.O'Neal
John Denman Comment by John Denman on July 19, 2008 at 9:34am
The first car I converted to CNG was a 1988 Pontiac Fiero back in 1992 powered by a turbocharged Oldsmobile Quad 4 engine. Pump gas was under a buck a gallon, but limited to 92 octane, and the Turbo Quad 4 running 18 PSI boost needed 102+ octane. After about 10 barrels of Phillips unleaded race fuel it was too much of a hassle to run (not to mention $2.50 a gallon).

A local welding/gas shop had a couple of cylinders that were ordered for CNG 2500 PSI that the customer never picked up, that pretty much started the ball rolling. It took me about a year to piece the system together.

I designed and fabricated a mechanical axial flow mass airflow metering head fed with a variable pressure single point "injector". The gas mixer maintained a constant head pressure of 3 PSI over manifold pressure. Pressure was adjustable as was the orifice size and pressure accumulator volume. An accelerator enrichment valve was added to cure a minor "stumble" opening the throttle from idle.

Two tanks were installed each with the equivalent storage of about 2.5 gallons of gas, limiting the range. Tanks were fitted with pressure regulators set to 45 PSI with a bypass to allow filling. Initially I ran it on propane since it was easy to fill. Doing some tuning I was able to run as much as 21 PSI of boost which was about the limit of the head gasket - which was O-Ringed after the first (and last) failure.

That was the easy part. I kept looking at the gas meter outside my house thinking there had to be a way....

About a year later a semiconductor manufacturer had a low volume pump that was used for silane and had a capability of up to 1800 PSI. Nice unit with an Allen Bradley controller for $200.

I drove the car as a daily driver for over 5 years, and later sold it in 1998. Some observations;

At 2000 miles the oil (Mobil 1 or Castrol Syntec) still looked clean. Eventually I extended oil changes to 10,000 miles.

Even with 21 PSI of boost, the motor never had any internal failures, and compression ratio was 8.5:1. ON a wheel dyno it was measured at 382 HP in 1994, and again in 1998 where it read 388 HP. The bottom end of the engine had over 90,000 miles, and the top end had over 70,000 miles. I am supicious that running CNG under proper tune will introduce less contaminents (metals/minerals) that add to corroision and wear.

Never had any leaks or other problems with the car. The compressor system burned out an AC motor ($400) and lost pressure potential eventially only able to reach 1500 PSI.

The entire cost of the conversion?
$1200 + countless hours of R&D.
Actual install and tune time was about 20 hours.

Cost savings? Not likely.

Cars run far better on CNG then they do gasoline. With an octane of 140, a higher ratio of hydrogen to carbon, and no refinement needed makes CNG the best fossil fuel available.

I've been considering the potential of doing CNG conversions commercially.
David Smith Comment by David Smith on July 19, 2008 at 7:35am
Pickens Army,

There may be relief in sight. We need to track this legislation and make sure the American people are protected as it moves through congress. This could open up the conversion market if we hold our representatives and senators feet to the fire.

Here is a piece of legislation that proposes to deal with the natural gas regulations on the federal level.

Senator James M. Inhofe of Oklahoma Introduces Drive America on Natural Gas Act and we need to show our support. This is a first step on the road to energy independence.

Below is the contact page.
http://inhofe.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.ContactForm


Here is Senator James M. Inhofes website

http://inhofe.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressRoom.PressReleases&ContentRecord_id=32cee86f-802a-23ad-4e25-8ceb2615ebae

The regulations of certification are addressed in a way to open up the market. Finally!!!!!!!!!

David Baker contributed this section.

We have to drown out the foreign oil Lobbyists in Washington. Collectively We have to become the VOICE for changing our reliance on foreign oil, by Vocalizing our Support for the wide scale use of Alternative Energy Producing Systems.

The ACTION we can take Today is to influence our LEGISLATURE. We must change the thinking in Washington. This is accomplished by CONTACTING your Senator, Representative, Governors.

The following links to Websites are one way of Contacting Congress. I find these links to be the quickest at getting to the "contact web form" used by most of Washington.

SENATORS:
http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm
and look for the link to their web form

Representatives:
https://forms.house.gov/wyr/welcome.shtml

To Contact Your Governor:
http://www.nga.org (national Gov. list)

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi
http://speaker.house.gov/contact/

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid
http://reid.senate.gov/contact/

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell
http://mcconnell.senate.gov/contact_form.cfm

http://www.usa.gov/Contact/Elected.shtml

© 2010   Created by PickensPlan

Badges  |  Community Guidelines  | Report an Issue  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service