PickensPlan

Homeowner seeking backyard wind power
By ALLISON BOURG Staff Writer
Subscribe to the Maryland Gazette

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A Pasadena man is seeking permission to put two wind turbines on his property near Downs Memorial Park, apparently the first such request to come before the county.
Richard Hawse and his wife, Mary, are not only requesting a zoning variance next week to allow structures taller than 25 feet on his 4-acre property close to Bodkin Point. He's also working with County Council to draft legislation that would allow other homeowners to do the same thing.

"There's no cost advantage for me to do this. It's for the betterment of the community," Mr. Hawse said.

Councilman Ron Dillon, R-Pasadena, said Mr. Hawse approached his office several months ago, looking for the county to establish guidelines on windmills.

Mr. Dillon said he's planning to introduce legislation next month that would permit turbines on private property. The legislation would address property line setbacks and other requirements to protect neighbors. He said Frederick County is crafting a similar statute.

"We truly do need to take a look at alternate energy sources," Mr. Dillon said. "(The Hawses) are the first ones who have come to us about it."

The debate over wind energy has picked up speed in the last few years as oil prices have soared.

Advocates point to turbines as a practical way of producing clean, renewable energy. The wind turns a turbine's blades, which spin a shaft that connects to a generator and makes electricity.

Opponents, on the other hand, complain turbines spoil the landscape, generate irritating shadow flicker and noise and can harm migratory birds. Skeptics also argue that turbines pose a danger to bats, whose sonar can't detect the moving blades at night.

Mr. Hawse said those people are misinformed.

"I think it's just a matter of change," he said. "For every opponent (of turbines), there's a proponent."

The Hawses will appear Tuesday before Administrative Hearing Officer Stephen LeGendre in Annapolis.

Officials from the Office of Planning and Zoning were unavailable for comment yesterday, but both Mr. Hawse and Mr. Dillon believe this would be the first residential turbine in the county if approved.

Mr. LeGendre said another county resident applied for a variance for turbines several months ago, but withdrew the application before a hearing was scheduled.

He said applying for a variance for turbines is just like applying for a variance for anything else. Among other things, Mr. Hawse will have to prove that there will be no adverse impact on neighbors and the structures won't change the character of the neighborhood.

Turbines have been a hot topic in Western Maryland, where wind energycompanies wanted to erect 400-foot-tall wind turbines atop state-owned rural ridges. After loud outcry from Garrett County residents, Gov. Martin O'Malley this spring said he would not allow turbines on state forest land.

Wind power companies are also contemplating offshore turbines near Ocean City.

Talk of turbines in Anne Arundel County has been largely absent until recently. Last week, Del. Ron George, R-Arnold, and Annapolis-based Alpha Energy said they are preparing a $30 million to $40 million proposal for six to 10 wind turbines near the existing radio towers on Greenbury Point.

That site could generate enough electricity to power 3,000 to 6,000 homes, according to projections for the project. Data from the U.S. Department of Energy show the site is the only place on the Chesapeake Bay corridor, outside of its mouth, with enough wind speed to make such a project viable.

Mr. Hawse said he's not sure how high his turbines would be, but he believes they would cost about $11,000 each to erect. He hasn't settled on a design.

"Most of Anne Arundel County doesn't have enough wind for turbines. But on the shoreline, we do," he said.

Mr. Hawse said his property is large and wooded enough that shadow flicker will not bother his neighbors. If Mr. LeGendre grants the variance, the turbines will be behind the Hawses' home, which he said can't be seen from the road.

---

The hearing will be held at 11 a.m. Tuesday in the County Council Chambers, on the first floor of the Arundel Center, 44 Calvert St. in Annapolis.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Published 09/20/08, Copyright © 2008 Maryland Gazette,
Glen Burnie, Md.
Copyright © 2007 Maryland Gazette


I will be attending the hearing and will let you know how it goes. This is history in the making for our county. No one has ever applied for this variance.

Share 

Comment

You need to be a member of PickensPlan to add comments!

Join this Ning Network

sosolar Comment by sosolar on February 28, 2009 at 2:12pm
VAWT of significant output on the horizon. Wait on those giant ugly noisy bird killers. Actually I think the bird argument/facts here are great, but why invite the enemy to the party when these chimney sized pole standing
babies beat every objection i have ever heard?. Horizontal is good in T Boone size settings...but we are still grid dependent. One VAWT will have everyone at your house when the power goes down.
sosolar Comment by sosolar on February 28, 2009 at 1:59pm
VAWT : vertical axis wind turbines are on the horizon (not those little buzzy things). they are silent, no bigger than a chimney or stand on a pole, don't freeze or sling stuff at the neighbors,. totally bird friendly. Have you seen them?? such an improvement over the designs we have known....home size., business size, factory size....
Anyone thinking big monster horizontal (what we all see when we hear wind turbine (TBoone size) ought to wait a few months before jumping into turbines that draw vehement objection from many,
Chris Comment by Chris on September 24, 2008 at 12:43am
In response to the concerns about avian and bat deaths as a result of turbine installation. According to the AWEA transmission lines (power lines) account for up to 174 million bird deaths a year, cars and trucks are responsible for 60-80 million deaths annually, and cats claim the lives of 1 billion birds each year. Where as the evil wind turbines are responsible for 0.003% of bird deaths annually. The national average is 1-6 bird deaths per MW per year. The United States has installed almost 17,000 MW of wind energy. Multiply the high end estimate of 6 deaths annually by Megawatts installed and you get 102,000 bird deaths a year from wind turbines. Hunters kill around 100 million birds per year, so turbine related bird deaths equal 0.1% of deaths caused by licensed hunters.

Here is the kicker; the carbon offset created by 750kW of installed wind turbines is roughly equivalent to planting 500 acres of forest. So our trade off right now is 102,00 annual avian fatalities for the equivalent of planting 1.1 million acres of forest. Call me crazy, but I think American hunters could sacrifice 0.1% of their kills next year, rather than re-foresting 50 billion square feet of land.

http://www.awea.org/pubs/factsheets/Wildlife_FAQ.pdf

© 2009   Created by PickensPlan

Badges  |  Community Guidelines  | Report an Issue  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service