We are being constantly bombarded with an almost overwhelming amount of data. Much of this data that is thrust in our face, in one manner or another, comes to us pre-evaluated. That is to say, that it comes tagged as being good, bad, interesting, important, useful, funny and so on and so forth. And many times we don’t bother to stop and evaluate the data we are getting for ourselves. Instead, we just accept what is labeled on the tag it comes with. While this approach is admittedly much easier and far less time consuming than doing a personal evaluation of the data, I don’t believe that it’s a healthy or even safe practice for one to habitually engage in. In fact, if we get into the habit of just accepting data as-is without personal inspection and query, its possible that we might actually be being brainwashed and not even know it.
True, being “educated” like we are in this country does tend to immobilize one via those educators who are denying their students the opportunity to develop original thought. And then there are the patterns of behavior enforced upon children at home as well as the school systems that nudge the child into responding automatically per an agreed upon set pattern of social responses. Indeed, the only technique of data evaluation put forth by our teachers at school is the preponderance of agreement technique via the authorities who act as the vanguard for such preponderance. In other words, "If everybody or such and such authority agrees then it must be this way..." Or, "If everybody or such and such authority disagrees or thinks this way or thinks that way then that must be the way it is." In any case, it’s no wonder why so many of us are in a state of apathy regarding the personal evaluation of data.
Regarding the current state of personal data evaluation, I would like to suggest that you consider a new approach to how you treat the data that you receive on such a multitude of levels and lines of communication. Below, I have five questions that you can ask of any data you receive.
Does the data you are receiving contain all the facts?
Is the sequence of events expressed in the data in their correct sequence?
Is the correct time noted in the data?
Is there any contradiction or falsehood noted in the data?
Is the particular data that is being emphasized as being important or being not important actually so?
Now here’s a little exercise for you to try this approach out on. Pick an article out of the newspaper or a news report from the television or something posted on this site and put it up against these five questions. How does your sample do? If it stands up to these questions there’s high probability that the data is logical. If it doesn’t then you’re vis-à-vis with illogic.
Arriving at sane and correct decisions depends on having accurate data, being able to determine the accuracy of the data and knowing how to evaluate that data. Being fed illogical data and not inspecting the data for one's self serves to bring about irrational thought, erroneous decisions and inappropriate actions that sooner or later end up bringing about destructive results.
Tags: data, evaluation, everybody, illogic, logic
Share
You need to be a member of PickensPlan to add comments!
Join this Ning Network