PickensPlan

1. Almost every country can become energy-independent. Anywhere that has sunlight and land can produce alcohol from plants. Brazil, the fifth largest country in the world imports no oil, since half its cars run on alcohol fuel made from sugarcane, grown on 1% of its land.


2. We can reverse global warming. Since alcohol is made from plants, its production takes carbon dioxide out of the air, sequestering it, with the result that it reverses the greenhouse effect (while potentially vastly improving the soil). Recent studies show that in a permaculturally designed mixed-crop alcohol fuel production system, the amount of greenhouse gases removed from the atmosphere by plants—and then exuded by plant roots into the soil as sugar—can be 13 times what is emitted by processing the crops and burning the alcohol in our cars.


3. We can revitalize the economy instead of suffering through Peak Oil. Oil is running out, and what we replace it with will make a big difference in our environment and economy. Alcohol fuel production and use is clean and environmentally sustainable, and will revitalize families, farms, towns, cities, industries, as well as the environment. A national switch to alcohol fuel would provide many millions of new permanent jobs.


4. No new technological breakthroughs are needed. We can make alcohol fuel out of what we have, where we are. Alcohol fuel can efficiently be made out of many things, from waste products like stale donuts, grass clippings, food processing waste-even ocean kelp. Many crops produce many times more alcohol per acre than corn, using arid, marshy, or even marginal land in addition to farmland. Just our lawn clippings could replace a third of the autofuel we get from the Mideast.


5. Unlike hydrogen fuel cells, we can easily use alcohol fuel in the vehicles we already own. Unmodified cars can run on 50% alcohol, and converting to 100% alcohol or flexible fueling (both alcohol and gas) costs only a few hundred dollars. Most auto companies already sell new dual-fuel vehicles.


6. Alcohol is a superior fuel to gasoline! It’s 105 octane, burns much cooler with less vibration, is less flammable in case of accident, is 98% pollution-free, has lower evaporative emissions, and deposits no carbon in the engine or oil, resulting in a tripling of engine life. Specialized alcohol engines can get at least 22% better mileage than gasoline or diesel.


7. It’s not just for gasoline cars. We can also easily use alcohol fuel to power diesel engines, trains, aircraft, small utility engines, generators to make electricity, heaters for our homes—and it can even be used to cook our food.


8. Alcohol has a proud history. Gasoline is a refinery’s toxic waste; alcohol fuel is liquid sunshine. Henry Ford’s early cars were all flex-fuel. It wasn’t until gasoline magnate John D. Rockefeller funded Prohibition that alcohol fuel companies were driven out of business.


9. The byproducts of alcohol production are clean, instead of being oil refinery waste, and are worth more than the alcohol itself. In fact, they can make petrochemical fertilizers and herbicides obsolete. The alcohol production process concentrates and makes more digestible all protein and non-starch nutrients in the crop. It’s so nutritious that when used as animal feed, it produces more meat or milk than the corn it comes from. That’s right, fermentation of corn increases the food supply and lowers the cost of food.


10. Locally produced ethanol supercharges regional economies. Instead of fuel expenditures draining capital away to foreign bank accounts, each gallon of alcohol produces local income that gets recirculated many times. Every dollar of tax credit for alcohol generates up to $6 in new tax revenues from the increased local business.


11. Alcohol production brings many new small-scale business opportunities. There is huge potential for profitable local, integrated, small-scale businesses that produce alcohol and related byproducts, whereas when gas was cheap, alcohol plants had to be huge to make a profit.


12. Scale matters—most of the widely publicized potential problems with ethanol are a function of scale. Once production plants get beyond a certain size and are too far away from the crops that supply them, closing the ecological loop becomes problematic. Smaller-scale operations can more efficiently use a wide variety of crops than huge specialized one-crop plants, and diversification of crops would largely eliminate the problems of monoculture.


13. The byproducts of small-scale alcohol plants can be used in profitable, energy-efficient, and environmentally positive ways. For instance, spent mash (the liquid left over after distillation) contains all the nutrients the next fuel crop needs and can return it back to the soil if the fields are close to the operation. Big-scale plants, because they bring in crops from up to 45 miles away, can’t do this, so they have to evaporate all the water and sell the resulting byproduct as low-price animal feed,which accounts for half the energy used in the plant.

Share 

Comment

You need to be a member of PickensPlan to add comments!

Join this Ning Network

mike fallwell Comment by mike fallwell on November 12, 2008 at 8:04pm
The Brazil process is well establish 3 billion gallons this year at $0.50/ gallon.
Larry Comment by Larry on November 12, 2008 at 6:33pm
Thanks Mike.

During my study of the MixAlco process, I remember seeing something about the problems
of other methods. One was the need for steril equipment (I think that involved genetically
engineered yeast). Another process had the problem of acid and temperature (I think).
I don't remember any mention of ethanol.

I'm just trying to get some idea of pros and cons of various approaches. One of the
A&M professors gave a presentation. Page 84 of:

http://www.cehd.tamu.edu/uploads/files/Holtzapple.pdf

describes the economics. A $1.65/gallon figure for gas
production was claimed on:

http://www.terrabon.com/images/release_09102008.pdf

Of course the price at the pump would have to add the transport
and profit margin; so, I guess one would need the comparable
cost,(i.e. at refinery exit), for gasoline from crude to see if it would
be cheaper.

Do you know of any similar figures for the Brazil process?
mike fallwell Comment by mike fallwell on November 12, 2008 at 5:25pm
The key feature is use of ethanol as a solvent at 400 degrees F .
An acid counter flow causes C5 and C6 sugars to exit at different locations.
Process time about 5 min.
Larry Comment by Larry on November 12, 2008 at 5:09pm
Mike, could you summarize this Brazilian process. One reason I ask is I've
been looking at a process that converts garbage to 95% gasoline. It comes
in two varieties. Part of one process converts biogas to gasloine using a
process which uses another process which can convert natural gas to
liquids for easier transportation. References to the two companies
working on these processes are:

http://www.che.tamu.edu/category/department

To find the article, search for:

Gov. Perry Lauds Completion of Biofuels Demonstration Plant

and:

Gasoline Produced From Biomass Could be in Fuel Tanks by 2010 with New Tech

There's also a pilot plant showing the NG to liquid conversion. I drove by it several
weeks ago.

My only connection with A&M is that I attended the school. I found references
to the Terrabon process a few days ago and to the gas-to-liquid process, which
is licensed by Dallas, Tx. based Synfuels International, Inc., a few months ago
in the local paper. I've not connection with any of these companies.
mike fallwell Comment by mike fallwell on November 12, 2008 at 1:39pm
The reason there is so much confusion among
professionals in this country is because we have no real experience,

We are at least 10 years behind Brazil.

You have been misinformed about the seriousness of the issues you have raised.
I won't argue the specifics because you seem very well informed.
But cost is an issue you ignored.
Are you familiar with the cheap new Brazilian celulosic process.
James A Stewart Comment by James A Stewart on November 12, 2008 at 11:30am
Part of what you have said is true, but there are some facts that need to be brought to the forefront. #1 Ethanol tends to absorb moisture, and will cause fuel tank corrosion issues, as well as pipeline issues. #2 The overall energetics of ethanol are not good.

During the Carter admin, the decision for ethanol over butanol was made, and it was a terribly bad decision. Butanol is non-flammable (but is combustible), has a RON value of 96, has 95% the heat content of gasoline, and will run a car either neat or in any blend with gasoline. Butalco of Switzerland is perfecting a GMO yeast that will convert lignocellulose into butanol. Marine algae can produce enough biomass to produce all the bio-diesel this nation can use on 1/7 the land now in corn production. The remaining protein and carbohydrates from the algae can be used in the butanol process, or the protein can be separated and fed to livestock as a supplemental feed.

© 2009   Created by PickensPlan

Badges  |  Community Guidelines  | Report an Issue  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service